比較バージョン

キー

  • この行は追加されました。
  • この行は削除されました。
  • 書式設定が変更されました。

...

  • Maureen gave an overview of the meetings during the week
  • JZ encouraged all members to join in the DNS abuse session
  • JZ gave a high level overview of the talking point, namely : DNS, PIR, Subsequent procedure, PICs, EPDP, Reviews
  • DNS abuse: one of the 2 most significant points for the year as it is the #1 for internet end users. Any new round must wait for a policy on DNS abuse.
  • in 2012 At-Large was vocal about ICANN not being ready to launch a new round. Specific recommendations include thresholds for TLDs, holistic tools for compliance, more research on machine learning to predict DNS abuse, increase friction for bulk registration, decrease friction for access to registrant data. 
  • PIR : there should be revisions to the contract to guarantee the use of such a reputable domain, PICs are recommended. Board members selection should be revised so as to include reserved board seats for representatives of nonprofits. Focus on Individual registrants and nonprofits should be enshrined to maintain public credibility of the domain.
  •  Marita mentioned "structural changes" as they were mentioned in the earlier session.
  • JZ mentioned the change in legal structure of PIR changing to for-profit company. There is an open public comment being run by PIR.
  • B-corp status is a topic to be analyzed so that At-Large can comment it, we should make sure in the CCWGCPWG
  • Joanna pointed out that these are talking points and the CCWG welcomes ideas to be discussed via mailing list and weekly calls, all are welcome to join the CCWG calls.
  • Subsequent procedures: relates to new rounds. At-Large position is there is no need to have a new round, DNS mitigation reform should happen first. Community priority evaluation, more work to be done on how to handle geonames.
  • PICs are part of contracts ICANN signs with Registries to put out a new TLD. Reform is needed on how these PICs are managed to be effective, both voluntary and mandatory. Enforcement has been insufficient. Pathway to enforcement is needed.  ALAC should be pre-authorized to bring a PIC DRP, reforms are needed.
  • EPDP- support automation whenever possible. supports recommendations SSRT and CCTRT.

Action Items 

  •  With regards to the change in legal structure of PIR changing to for-profit company, the CCWG CPWG should analyze the "B-corp status" proposal as a topic,  so that At-Large can comment on this aspect. The topic will be discussed within the CCWGCPWG. Evin Erdogdu

At-Large Policy Session: DNS Abuse: An At-Large Call to Action - EE

...

  • Mason Cole (GNSO) also requested increased collaboration between GNSO and ALAC/At-Large on DNS Abuse.
  • Jonathan Zuck moderated a quiz session for all participants.

Action Items

  •  Add DNS Abuse to ICANN Learn courses being developed for At-Large: Joanna Kulesza commented this is in progress; can be incorporated in ICANN Learn as well as additional resources across the community, with RALO collaboration via the CBWG.

...

Jamie & James: This is under GAC safeguards, so it is not really possible.

Action Items

  •  Jaime Hedlund to follow up some cases offline.

...

Members of the At-Large end user community within ICANN, as well as a total of 185 participants from around the world, asked questions and shared their feedback on the topic during the well-attended virtual meeting.

Action Items

...

177 participants at peak.

Action Items


Joint ALAC & GAC

...

Meeting - SV 

Notes

Maureen expressed appreciation to the GAC members for this meeting.

...

GAC and ALAC inter-sessional calls are contributing to build capacities. Manal pointed out that significant progress has been made.AI:

  •  GAC/ALAC to continue discussions on SubPro inter-sessionally and through email.


EPDP

Hadia presented 5 topics of interest, on GDPR pointed out that we are over complying with GDPR requirements, pointed out a Hybrid model is a good solution, pointed out that automation is also a good approach, urgent SSAD requests, accuracy of GTLD registration data; distinction between legal and natural persons.

...

PF - Discussed security issues, IT security and cybersecurity definitions. Cyber security is when there is antagonist intent; Discussed lasagna vs pipes. DNNS vs https and encryption. Cross-border jurisdictions are challenging. Hopefully, greater alignment among jurisdictions will be the useful. 

Questions:

How far does the proposal for popular sovereignty align with the concept of global commons in international law , or a common heritage principle? Do you see potential for framing it through these or similar principles under international law? 

PF - International law is difficult, would like to see more collaboration between national jurisdictions. 

Do you see the increase in IX traffic due to remote workers? 

PF - Sees the internet at the same level as water and electricity. 

Role of ICANN holds in digital forensics; capacity building. 

PF - Pointed out why attribution is important as it determines who will need to deal with it. 

How should a national entity deal with the need to block content - or can it - once DoH/DoT is in place?

PF - Need to look at whether the same tools can do the blocking and whether the same jurisdictions are responsible. PF questioned whether enough is being done. 

JK summary - Thanked the panelists, staff,, etc. Looked forward that this theme is picked up within the ICANN community. 

Participants: 260

Thursday, 12 March 2020

At-Large ICANN67 Wrap Up - EE/AE

Notes 

Maureen introduced the session, Jonathan, Holly and Joanna provided a summary of their respective policy sessions during ICANN67. Jonathan and Joanna provided an update on the At-Large Policy Platform, including Q&A from the community.

Maarten Botterman provided an update of the Virtual ICANN67 Meeting, noting the attention on ICANN hosting the first virtual meeting. High participation in the sessions via Zoom, including active chat rooms. Was curious to hear ALAC/At-Large perspective.

Jonathan Zuck noted with thanks the Board's foresight, and acknowledged the initial response from the ICANN community was abusive towards the Board, and noted language participation.

Alan Greenberg echoed, saying that the ALAC / At-Large perspective that ICANN67 was tremendously successful. Noted that going forward, "how to cover the things we could not do".

Göran noted that ICANN Meetings (F2F) are integral to ICANN's DNA.

Sebastien noted that the Virtual Meeting format helped to make productive sessions, was encouraging of the virtual sessions as they were productive.

Göran noted the pre-ICANN meeting webinars were very high. Noted that the chats were very active, having one chat resulted in many comments/questions/dialogue. That the chats added great value to the meeting and engagement with ICANN Board / community. Wanted to examine best practices for potential Virtual Meeting(s) going forward.

Leon noted the success of the meeting and how important the languages/interpretation services are, and looking into additional Zoom features for remote meetings. Encouraged everyone to provide feedback of the virtual meeting experience.

Alan Greenberg commented that the meetings all started and ended on time. He then presented on the ALS Mobilization Report.

156 participants

Action Items

  •  Evin Erdogduto post pics/tweets of top 3 winners on the SMWG workspace and feature in their regional newsletters.