Page History
...
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Griffin Barnett |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Actions:
Notes:
Question 2: individual proposals #1 and #12 Individual Proposal #1: -- Sub Team members noting that they are not in favor of the proposal. -- Focus attention on things we have identified to improve. -- No evidence that the bad effects of RPMs outweigh the benefits. -- Registries/Registrars comments on eliminating or shortening the claims doesn't seem to have an effect on cybersquatting. Individual Proposal #12: -- We don't know the effects that the current period is having. Don't know that we have evidence to justify extending it. -- Support for the proposal -- intertwined with improving the TM Claims notice. If the does what we'd like it to do then it provides a service for the applicants and TM holder. If we have a valid claims statement then this is a rational suggestion. -- Think we have talked about this. -- Value to put this as a question for comment. -- Could compile a list of data we think should be collected for future review. -- Thought there was agreement to put the proposal out for comment. |
...