Page History

...

Members of the EPDP Team’s legal committee proposed using the same independent outside counsel for both the EPDP Team and ICANN Org. To that end, in the “Considerations for Procurement of Legal Services” document compiled by Kurt Pritz, the Phase 1 Chair, which incorporated the Statement of Work written by Stephanie Perrin and Diane Plaut, as well as a note on Conflict (by Margie Milam), and on possible efficiencies by Thomas Rickert, it was noted that the same outside counsel could be used for both the EPDP Team and ICANN org. The notes to ICANN included in the “Considerations” document stated that it was the EPDP Team’s belief that both ICANN org and the EPDP Team would require answers to the same or similar questions and that, therefore, reaching out to one firm might avoid duplicate costs and also potentially conflicting advice.

Question:

Does ICANN org plan to share the TSG’s report with the EPBD/DPAs? If so, please provide more information on the timeline.

Response:

Dear EPDP Team,

Thank you for your question. As you may know, the Technical Study Group has been exploring technical solutions for authenticating, authorizing, and providing access to non-public registration data for third parties with legitimate interests.   More information regarding ICANN org’s next steps following the draft technical model shared during ICANN 64 can be found on Göran’s blog post published on 5 April 2019.