AF: Hadia Elminiawi, Seun Ojedeji, Tijani Ben Jemaa
AP: Holly Raiche (apology), Kaili Kan, Maureen Hilyard
EUR: Bastiaan Goslings (apology), Joanna Kulesza, Sébastien Bachollet
LAC: Bartlett Morgan, Humberto Carrasco (absent), Ricardo Holmquist (apology)
NA: Javier Rúa-Jovet, John Laprise (apology), Marita Moll
Liaisons: Andrei Kolesnikov (SSAC) (apology), Barrack Otieno (ccNSO) (absent), Cheryl Langdon-Orr (GNSO), Yrjö Lansipuro (GAC)
Dial Out Participants:
EN: Holly Raiche, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Maureen Hilyard, Daniel Nanghaka, Sébastien Bachollet, Abdulkarim Ayopo Oloyede, Chibuzor Nicodemus, Daniel Ugonna Ononiwu, Glenn McKnight, Judith Hellerstein, Nenad Marinkovic, Satish Babu, Greg Shatan, Leon Sanchez, Alan Greenberg, Avri Doria, Erich Schweighofer, Lianna Galstyan, Maritza Aguero, Mohamed El Bashir, Abdeldjalil Bachar Bong, Gabriel Bombambo, Hadia Elminiawi, Seun Ojedeji, Kaili Kan, Joanna Kulesza, Marita Moll, Yrjö Lansipuro
ES: Harold Arcos, Alexis Anteliz, Sergio Salinas Porto, Alberto Soto, Maritza Aguero, Humberto Carrasco
FR: Abdeldjalil Bachar Bong,None
Apologies: Andrei Kolesnikov, Ricardo Holmquist, Holly Raiche, Bastiaan Goslings, Jonathan Zuck, John Laprise, Bram Fudzulani, Barrack Otieno, Abdalmonem Galila,
Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Gisella Gruber, Evin Erdoğdu, Claudia Ruiz, Siranush Vardanyan, Yeşim Nazlar
FR: Isabelle & Jacques
ES: Veronica, Claudia, Paula
RU: Ekaterina & Yuliya
Call Management: Yeşim Nazlar
Adopted Motions: EN
3. ALAC Policy Development Activities - Evin Erdoğdu, Olivier Crepin-Leblond and Jonathan Zuck (20 minutes)
Registration Directory Service (RDS-WHOIS2) Review Team Draft Report of Recommendations
The primary concern for the ALAC in the RDS-WHOIS2 Review is the accuracy of registrant data (WHOIS data) and its use by security and law enforcement bodies in addressing the misuse and abuse of the DNS system. The ALAC summarized their positions on the 16 Recommendations under Objective 1, as well as Objectives 3, 5, 6 and the ICANN Bylaws.
ICANN Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Unified Access Model
The ALAC cited their prior statement from 10 April 2018 relating to the access of WHOIS, and offered (4) general comments on the proposed UAM: (1) Any access model must be compliant with the GDPR, and ICANN should obtain legal advice from expert counsel to confirm compliance; (2) Internet end user rights should be part of the calculus, including knowledge of email sender identity, et al; (3) The UAM design should be scalable and not overly-reliant upon manual updates, and should have a well-defined taxonomy of abuse types, et al. Once an agreed upon set of inputs and outcomes is established, an automated system may be created to respond to WHOIS requests; (4) The various harms taken into account when considering the UAM must be done so in a non-biased fashion.
Proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile
The ALAC recommends that ICANN adopt the RDAP quickly and effectively because they hold it is an essential step for ICANN to deploy a tiered-access model adequately. In addition, the ALAC recommends that ICANN address 5 ambiguities in the RDAP that are also present in the European Union's (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), noting them in the statement.
Next Steps on Reviews
The ALAC supports the proposed path forward for the ATRT3, while stating the consideration of how to streamline specific reviews to make them more effective and impactful is a low priority item for ATRT3. The ALAC encourages active community participation in formulating any recommendations in organizational reviews, and states that specific reviews operating standards should take a minimalist approach.
Proposed Consensus Policy on Protections for Certain Red Cross and Red Crescent Names in All Generic Top-Level Domains
The ALAC continues to take the position that as a humanitarian organization, and one that has been regularly the target of those seeking to fraudulently attract donations, the Red Cross should be afforded the courtesy of having its various identifiers protected at the second level in gTLD domain names. The ALAC cited its June 2018 statement of support for the Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names in all gTLDs – Policy Amendment Process, and affirmed support for the Reconvened WG's recommendations on proposed amendments.
Follow-Up to the Joint Statement by ALAC and GAC: Enabling Inclusive, Informed and Meaningful Participation at ICANN (Note: submitted to ICANN Board as ALAC Advice)
In its follow up to the joint statement, the ALAC and GAC agreed in the context of the Information Transparency Initiative (ITI) that clear and up-to-date information (from ICANN) to facilitate quick understanding of relevant issues and high interest topics is key for inclusive, informed and meaningful participation by all stakeholders, including non-experts – as, in the context of the IANA transition process – ICANN was able to offer timely and comprehensible information by breaking down complex issues into understandable components, which allowed interaction within the entire community. The ALAC and the GAC ask from ICANN that the same level of effort be made and the same service be provided to the community concerning information on all other relevant issues.
Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets
After consultations with the ICANN Finance Department and ALAC Finance and Budget Subcommittee (FBSC), the ALAC submitted comment on (4) sections of the Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets, including the Executive Summary, PTI Services Financial Overview, PTI Services Overview and PTI Services and Operating Plan.
Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT) Final Report & Recommendations
As the principal voice of Internet end users within the ICANN community, the ALAC were interested in the findings and recommendations from the CCT Review, particularly in the areas of Choice and Trust. The ALAC is supportive of all of the recommendations in the Report, including the new ones relating to DNS abuse in New gTLDs. The ALAC reiterated they do not share a sense of urgency when it comes to subsequent procedures, but instead believe the community should address all of the deficiencies in the 2012 program before accepting additional applications. The ALAC commented on additional sections of the Report and Recommendations, including Recommendations 1, 8-10, 11-13, 14-25, 29-31, 32, 33 and 34-35.
Initial Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group
The ALAC have been following this issue closely, and discussed the issues internally prior to the issuance of the Initial Report. The ALAC discussed each of these mechanisms among the participants and members of the working group, and in their statement commented on Recommendations 1-10, noting it believes strongly that At-Large Structures (ALSes) and Individual members should be able to apply for funds; the proceeds from past auctions were intended for use in capacity building activities enhancing the mission of ICANN and consistent with one of its core principles for an “open and interoperable Internet”, for the benefit of the Internet community.
Draft Final Report of the Security and Stability Advisory Committee Review (SSAC2)
The ALAC is in support of the SSAC’s continued role in the ICANN community as an Advisory Committee. It commented specifically on Recommendations 1-5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16-17, 21-22, 24 and 25 in the Report, noting that the SSAC should, in addition to revising its advice to the Board, also simultaneously attempt to write advice in such a way that non-technical experts in the ICANN community more easily understand them.
- Application for New Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Dispute-Resolution Service Provider
Public Comment Name
Public Comment Close
|Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets|
Note: Initial draft submitted to public comment; revised draft to follow after IGF.
03 Justine Chew
4. Review of current ALS and Individual Member applications – Evin Erdoğdu (5 minutes)
Reference: Decertification Wikispace
|None None. Note: AFRALO recently ratified their AFRALO Decertification Rules.|
|Awaiting advice (3)|
#292 Asociacion Civil Para la Investigacion Social y Tecnica de Internet (AGEIA España) - EURALO (to confirm status), #291 Red de Desarrollo Sostenible - Honduras - LACRALO (awaiting regional feedback - Bylaws posted), #282 Association pour le Développement des Sociétés de l'Information au Tchad (ADESIT) - AFRALO (awaiting regional feedback)
|Due diligence (4)||#295 Fondation Femme TIC et Développement Durable - AFRALO (staff processing due diligenceawaiting applicant feedback), #294 BIKLAB - LACRALO (staff processing due diligenceawaiting applicant feedback), #293 ACSIS COTE D'IVOIRE - AFRALO (awaiting applicant feedback), #288 Liberia Information Technology students Union - AFRALO (awaiting applicant feedback)|
|On hold||#270 BSDCongo - AFRALO, #267 Surabhi Softwares, #112 Arab Regional ISPs & DSPs Association (ARISPA) - APRALO|
Recently certified: 2 - EURALO, 4 - AFRALO, 1 - APRALO; Applications: None.
2 - APRALO. Note: Over 100 Individual Members have been accepted across the 5 RALOs.
- EOY ALS Contact Update in progress.
- LACRALO Orientation Call to be scheduled the week of 14 December 2018; Reference: RALO ALS and Individual Orientation Calls: NARALO 06 September 2017, APRALO 19 June 2017.
c. RALO Chairs: AFRALO, APRALO, EURALO, LACRALO and NARALO
See: At-Large Reports from WGs
6. EPDP - Next Steps - Alan Greenberg and Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi (15 minutes)
7. ATRT3 - Introduction by At-Large Representatives
- Sebastien Bachollet, Cheryl Langdon-Orr,
Daniel Nanghaka and Vanda Scartezini (10 minutes)
8. Update and Discussion with Leon Sanchez, Board Director Selected by At-Large (10 minutes)
Next Steps on ARIWG Implementation Plan - Maureen Hilyard and Cheryl Langdon-Orr (5 minutes)
10. Next Steps on ATLAS III - Maureen Hilyard, Olivier Crepin-Leblond and Eduardo Diaz (5 minutes)
11. Review of WG Appointments and Follow up on Needed Appointments - Maureen Hilyard and Alan Greenberg (10 minutes)
12. Review of At-Large at ICANN63 - Maureen Hilyard (5 minutes)
a. Review of outstanding Action Items from ICANN63 requiring ALAC involvement
b. Follow Up Actions
11. Initial discussion of ICANN64 - Maureen Hilyard and Gisella Gruber (15 minutes)
a. Travel Policy Update and Discussion with Constituency Travel (7 minutes)
b. Follow up of suggestions for ICANN64 from ICANN63 Development Session
i. Staff to prepare a policy brief before each ICANN Public Meeting with the aim of identifying the key policy items (paragraph /up to one page) and At-Large message on these issues
ii. At-Large public meetings to be 80:20 (issues : administration) to prioritize substantive issues going forward.
iii. Staff to ensure titles of At-Large sessions to include the substantive topic being discussed (Not just "At-Large Leadership Session #1")
iv. Staff to ensure individual name tags should have an end stripe (RALO colors?) to make them more visible when people want to speak.
v. Staff to ensure an annual CPWG workshop to be held at an ICANN Public meeting. Interested members of At-Large as well as Fellows and NextGen to be invited. (Which Meeting: Community Forum, Policy Forum or AGM?)
At-Large Sessions Overview, including SO/ACs meetings
b. Leadership Skills Strategy
c. Social Events