Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

ICANN org published the SubPro Operational Design Assessment (ODA) on 12 December and in advance of the publication of the ODA, the Council received a briefing on 7 December. During the Council’s December meeting, it agreed on the benefit of providing Council input on the ODA, if any, to the ICANN Board in support of the Board workshop taking place around the 20th of January. The Council established a small team to review the ODA in detail, concentrating on identifying areas of ICANN org analysis that may not be true to the intent of the SubPro Final Report, as well as developing impressions of Option 2 contained in the ODA. Given the tight timelines, there will not be adequate time for the small team to provide draft input to the Council by the document and motions deadline. Accordingly, the expectation is that the input, delivered on [date]13 January 2023, shall be sent to the Board, but include the caveat that it was not formally adopted by the Council. Since the small team has shared its proposed draft, Kurt Pritz provided an alternative version on 17 January 2023. Paul McGrady followed on 18 January 2023 with another version as well.

Here, the Council will receive a briefing from the small team on draft input on the SubPro ODA and acknowledge that it will be passed on to the ICANN Board for its consideration.

...

5.1 – Introduction of topic (Council leadership) Slide deck

5.2 – Council discussion

5.3 – Next steps

...

The Council initiated the two-phased Transfer Policy Review PDP in February 2021. Since it began meeting in May 2021, the WG has made steady progress on its Phase 1 charter questions, including publishing its Phase 1A Initial Report for public comment. The WG conducted preliminary deliberations on Phase 1B topics during the Phase 1A Initial Report public comment period, then reviewed public comments on the Phase 1A Initial Report, and is now completing revisions to preliminary recommendations, taking into account public comment received. . 

In the course of Phase 1 work conducted to date, the WG discovered that certain Phase 2 topics must be addressed before Phase 1 recommendations can be fully developed. As a result, the leadership team is preparing a PCR to update its work plan to consolidate all work into a single phase and change the order in which topics are considered. This will impact the timeline for key deliverables. In order to ensure that Council fully understands the potential changes prior to being asked to accept the Project Change Request (PCR), the changes and potential implications will be shared with the Council.

...

6.1 – Introduction of topic (Roger Carney, Chair of the Transfer Policy Review PDP) Slide deck

6.2 – Council discussion

6.3 – Next steps

...

7.1 – Introduction of topic(Council leadership) Slide Deck

7.2 – Council discussion

7.3 - Next steps

...

Item 8: ANY OTHER BUSINESS (5 minutes)

8.1 - ICANN76 Planning - Draft Schedule

8.2 - Non-objection to Additional Budget Requests

...