Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Info

PROPOSED AGENDA


Reviewing 14 URS appeals

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS


Info
titleRECORDINGS

Mp3

Tip
titlePARTICIPATION

Attendance and WebEx chat

Apologies: Rebecca Tushnet, Zak Muscovitch 

Note

Notes/ Action Items


SUB TEAM ACTION ITEMS:

 


  • Sub Team members to consider if there is a need to delve further into the 14 appeal cases, and (subject to an update from Rebecca and Alex – see below) whether to recommend proceeding with a review of the 58 cases where a respondent prevailed against a complainant.
 


STAFF ACTION ITEMS:

  • Staff to check the list of questions being considered by the URS Providers Sub Team, to see if it includes questions concerning: (1) issues about adherence to the URS procedures and rules raised by parties to a case; and (2) problems with notifications to/from registry operators and registrars as well as with regard to timing for carrying out locking and resolving of domains in dispute.
 


  • Staff to touch base with Rebecca Tushnet and Alex Noonan, to find out: (1) if their research will cover the 58 “respondent prevailed” and 250 “response filed” cases; and (2) when they expect to be able to provide initial data to the Working Group.
 


  • Staff to consolidate Sub Team comments into a summary report for the Working Group call next Wednesday.