Page History
...
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Theo Geurts (RrSG),Catherine Merdinger (RrSG), James Galvin (RySG), Prudence Malinki (RrSG), Berry Cobb (staff) Alternates: Jothan Frakes (RrSG), Jody Kolker (RrSG), Beth Bacon (RySG), Rich Brown (RrSG) |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Chat Transcript (see Zoom recording, chat tab) GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Note | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notes/ Action Items
ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK:
Recommendation 2: 2. Staff to write up the recommendation to keep the Losing FOA functionality with flexibility on terminology and format. Recommendation 3: 3. (f) Proposed edit -- Staff to provide revised draft language to change to mandatory (“MUST”). 4. (g) Proposed Edit -- Staff to revise the language in the Working Document to change to “notification of TAC issuance” and WG to review/comment. Recommendation 4: 5. (c) Proposed Edit -- Staff to revise the recommendation text to include “For the purposes of sending the notification, the Registrar of Record should use contact information as it was in the registration data at the time of the transfer request.” 6. (d) Proposed Edit -- Staff to provide draft language for the WG to consider. 7. (e) Proposed Edit -- Staff to revise as suggested in the proposed next step but also to confirm that this and similar language is consistent. Recommendation 5: 8. (b) Proposed Edit -- Staff to revise the language in the Working Document as suggested in the potential next step. Recommendation 6: 9. (a) Concern -- Staff to revise the language in the Working Document as suggested in the potential next step. 10. (b) Concern -- Staff to revise the language in the Working Document as suggested in the potential next step. 11. (c) Proposed Edit -- Staff to revise the language in the Working Document as suggested in the potential next step. 12. (d) Proposed Edit -- Registrars to discuss. Recommendation 7: 13. WG members to review prior to next Tuesday’s meeting: See the Working Document Tool at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1796UeXK6GspA7cehLcSn5tWiCyuR7JU7hOfKHgCSVz4/edit. Notes:
2. Welcome and Chair Updates
3. Continue Discussion of Notification of TAC Provision – Recommendation 3 (see Public Comment Review Tool and Working Document [docs.google.com])
Discussion:
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 3, (f) Proposed edit -- Staff to provide revised draft language to change to mandatory (“MUST”).
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 3, (g) Proposed Edit -- Staff to revise the language in the Working Document to change to “notification of TAC issuance” and WG to review/comment.
Discussion:
Discussion:
4. Continue Discussion of Notification of Transfer Completion – Recommendation 4 (Public Comment Review Tooland Working Document [docs.google.com]), including the question for community input on Recommendation 4 (Public Comment Review Tooland Working Document [docs.google.com])
Discussion:
Discussion:
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 4, (c) Proposed Edit -- Staff to revise the recommendation text to include “For the purposes of sending the notification, the Registrar of Record should use contact information as it was in the registration data at the time of the transfer request.”
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 4, (d) Proposed Edit -- Staff to provide draft language for the WG to consider.
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 4, (e) Proposed Edit -- Staff to revise as suggested in the proposed next step but also to confirm that this and similar language is consistent. Note re: Additional Considerations (f) and (g) – save for Phase 2.
Discussion:
5. Begin Discussion on Recommendation 5 (Public Comment Review Tooland Working Document [docs.google.com]) and Recommendation 6 (Public Comment Review Tool and Working Document [docs.google.com]) Recommendation 5:
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 5, (b) Proposed Edit -- Staff to revise the language in the Working Document as suggested in the potential next step. Recommendation 6:
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 6, (a) Concern -- Staff to revise the language in the Working Document as suggested in the potential next step.
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 6, (b) Concern -- Staff to revise the language in the Working Document as suggested in the potential next step.
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 6, (c) Proposed Edit -- Staff to revise the language in the Working Document as suggested in the potential next step.
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 6, (d) Proposed Edit -- Registrars to discuss. Recommendation 7: ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 7 -- WG members to review prior to next Tuesday’s meeting: See the Working Document Tool at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1796UeXK6GspA7cehLcSn5tWiCyuR7JU7hOfKHgCSVz4/edit. 6. AOB |