Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Draft motion – Confirmation that modification to the procedure that implements the Whois conflicts with privacy law policy recommendation with the Contracted Party Request and Legal Opinion triggers is consistent with the intent of the policy recommendation - MOTION WITHDRAWN

Submitted by: Keith Drazek

...

Submitted by: Donna Austin

Seconded by: Rafik Dammak

Whereas,


1.The GNSO Council adopted the proposed process and criteria for the selection of the GNSO representative to the Empowered Community Administration during its meeting on 28 June 2017 (see https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201706).

2.Per that process, the GNSO Council confirmed on 9 November 2017 that the GNSO Chair (currently Heather Forrest) will represent the GNSO as the Decisional Participant on the Empowered Community Administration on an interim basis. 

...

1.The GNSO Council hereby confirms [Name] Heather Forrest will represent the GNSO as the Decisional Participant on the Empowered Community Administration until the end of the ICANN Annual General Meeting (ICANN63).

...

Submitted by Donna Austin

Seconded by Rafik Dammak

Whereas,


1.The Governmental Advisory Committee advises the ICANN Board on issues of public policy, and especially where there may be an interaction between ICANN's activities or policies and national laws or international agreements. It usually does so as part of a Communiqué, which is published towards the end of every ICANN meeting.

...

1.The GNSO Council adopts the GNSO Review of the Abu Dhabi GAC Communiqué (see [include link] https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-gac-communique-30nov17-en.pdf) and requests that the GNSO Council Chair communicate the GNSO Review of the Abu Dhabi GAC Communiqué to the ICANN Board.

...

Submitted by Darcy Southwell

Seconded by Donna Austin


1.The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council sent a letter (see https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/bladel-to-crocker-01dec16-en.pdf) to the ICANN Board on 1 December 2016 regarding implementation concerns with the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy ("Transfer Policy") – Part C for privacy/proxy registrations. Specifically, the concerns relate to whether the addition/removal of a privacy/proxy service potentially triggers the 60-day inter-registrar transfer lock described in the updated Transfer Policy. The policy recommendations were silent with respect to the addition/removal of privacy/proxy services, and at the time the policy was implemented, the current issue and potential harms described by the GNSO Council were not brought to ICANN org's attention.

...

1.The GNSO Council directs the PPSAI IRT to consider the issue of privacy/proxy registrations and IRTP Part C as outlined in the annex to the GNSO Council letter (see https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/bladel-to-crocker-01dec16-en.pdf) and to put forward recommendations for implementation that are consistent with the IRTP Part C policy recommendations as well as the PPSAI policy recommendations.

...