Page History
...
Draft Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting 12 April 2012 To be
approved on 30 April 2012.
http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/mailingminutes-lists/archives/council/msg12945.htmlcouncil-12apr12-en.htm
1.5. GNSO Pending Projects List
http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf
...
Item 3: Best practices for addressing abusive registrations (10 15 minutes)
Following the recommendation of the Registration Abuse Policies (RAP) Working Group, the GNSO Council requested a discussion paper on the creation of non-binding best practices to help registrars and registries address the abusive registrations of domain names.
...
Refer to motion 1[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+10+May+2012
]
3.2 Reading of the motion (Zahid Jamil)
...
Item 5: International Olympics Committee /Red Cross Names Drafting Team (IOC/RC DT) (10 minutes)15 minutes)
On September 14, 2011, the GAC submitted a proposal to the GNSO Council to protect IOC and RC marks at the top and second level for all new gTLDs.
At its March 26 meeting, the GNSO Council approved the IOC/RC DT's recommendations (see resolution passed by the Council here http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions#20120326-1). However, these recommendations did not contain any proposals with regard to the protection of these marks at the second level.
On April 10, 2012, the Board established the New gTLD Program Committee and granted it all of the powers of the Board to exercise Board-level authority for any and all issues that may arise relating to the New gTLD Program. The Committee met on 10 April 2012 and resolved not to update the New gTLD Applicant Guidebook at this time (see http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/prelim-report-new-gtld-10apr12-en.htm).
On April 12, 2012, the GNSO Council approved a motion requesting an Issue Report on protection of names and acronyms of IGOs at the top and second level for all new gTLDs.
In the light of this both the Board decision and the decision by the Council to request an Issue Report on the protection of names and acronyms at the top and second level for all new gTLDs , this discussion item aims to determine whether the Council should (i) continue the IOC/RC DT to recommend a complete response to the GAC proposal at the second level, (ii) disband the IOC/RC DT and prepare a response to the GAC proposal on its own, (iii) disband the IOC/RC DT until the potential new PDP progresses and delay any response to the GAC, or (iv) whether fresh new instructions should be given to the DT.
5.1 DT Update from Staff (X Y).Discussion
5.2 Discussion5.3 Next Steps
Item 6: Update on the Joint Supporting Organisations/Advisory Committee on New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group( JAS WG) (10 15 minutes)
This item aims to provide the Council with a status update on the JAS WG so that next steps for the group can be determined.
...
Item 7: Synthesis of WHOIS Service Requirements - The WHOIS Access recommendation (10 5 minutes)
The WHOIS access recommendation was considered as part of the consent agenda at the Council's 16 February 2012 meeting.
...
This agenda item is to determine what next steps, if any, should be planned for this project item.
7.1 Update from Staff (X Y/ISP (Marila Konings,Wolf-Ulrich Knoben)
7.2 Discussion
7.3 Next steps
...
8.1 WG update from Staff (Steve Cheng)Sheng)
http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/status-update-ird-wg-final-report-slides-10may12-en.pdf
8.2 Discussion
Item 9: Any Other Business (5 minutes15 minutes)
9.1 Discussion on recent Board announcement to alter ICANN meeting Friday schedule.
9.2 Discussion on ALAC proposal for ICANN Academy.
9.3 URS update in draft budget – should the Council write to the Board to request that it be involved? (introduction from Staff)
Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3)
...
