Page History
SSAC Response to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (PDP)
Working Group Community Comment 2 (R-1)
| Date Issued | Document | Reference ID | Current Phase | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSAC Response to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group Community Comment 2 (R-1) | SAC094 |
|
Description:
This is the SSAC's response to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group Community Comment 2.
On 22 March 2017, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) opened a public comment forum to obtain input on the Community Comment 2 (CC2) questionnaire developed by the GNSO's Policy Development Process Working Group that is evaluating what changes or additions need to be made to existing new gTLD policy recommendations.
STATUS UPDATES
| Date | Phase | Type | Status Updates | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 4 | AP Feedback | SSAC notes that while this item is deferred, there has been recent work in the community related to SAC095. Does any of this recent work impact the implementation status of SAC095 Rec 1? | ||||||||
| Phase 4 | Phase Update | SubPro WG has included RZ-LGR based on IDNA2008 for validating TLDs. Existing IDN gTLDs and ccTLDs are also based on IDNA2008. So this advice is already addressed to a large extent. ccNSO is also doing its policy development to replace IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process and is most likely to utilize IDNA2008 as a base standard for IDN ccTLDs. Thus, this advice is being implemented both currently and in upcoming policies for GNSO and ccNSO. | ||||||||
| Phase 4 | Phase Update | This item remains deferred pending further consideration by the ccNSO and GNSO in the context of their IDN related PDPs. | ||||||||
| Phase 4 | Phase Update | Further implementation of this item is deferred as of 30 June 2019 pending external activity. ICANN org will take up further work once the GNSO and ccNSO have considered these items as part of their policy development work. | ||||||||
| Phase 4 | Phase Update | IDN ccTLD Fast Track process already limits labels at top level to IDNA2008 which does not allow for emojis (see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-cctld-implementation-plan-28mar19-en.pdf). Further, GNSO is considering limiting the TLDs to IDNA2008 (through the use of Root Zone Label Generation Rules) for the subsequent procedures for the gTLDs. The policy work is still under development by the community. Limiting TLDs to Root Zone LGRs is also recommended in the recent recommendations for IDN variant TLDs published at https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/idn-variant-tld-implementation-2018-07-26-en and adopted by the ICANN Board at ICANN64 for further consideration by GNSO and ccNSO. Finally the recent work on technical use of Root Zone LGR by the study group also recommends the same: see recommendations 1 and 2 in the report at https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/recommendations-rz-lgr-14may19-en.pdf. Further implementation of this item is deferred as of 30 June 2019 pending external activity. ICANN org will take up further work once the GNSO and ccNSO have considered these items as part of their policy development work. | ||||||||
| Phase 4 | Phase Change | SAC095 Recommendation 1 is Open in Phase 4: Deferred | ||||||||
| Closed | Phase Change | This Advice Item is now Closed | |||||||||
| Phase 5 | Phase Update | The ICANN organization understands this is the SSAC's response to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group Community Comment 2. The respective public comment period closed on 22 May 2017. A Report of Public Comments will be published on 12 June 2017 and this comment will be included in that consideration ( |
| Phase 4 | Phase Update | The ICANN Organization understands recommendation 1 of SAC095 to mean that the SSAC recommends that the ICANN Board reject any TLD (root zone label) that includes emoji. This understanding was confirmed by the SSAC on 18 August 2017. The ICANN Board considered this item at ICANN60 in Abu Dhabi: https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutionspublic-comments/cc2-new-gtld-subsequent-procedures-2017-1103-02-en#1.e. The Board directed the ICANN to engage with gTLD and ccTLD communities on the findings and recommendations in SAC095 in addition to requesting that the ccNSO and GNSO integrate conformance with IDNA2008 and its successor into their relevant policies so as to safeguard security, stability, resiliency and interoperability of domain names. |
| Phase 4 | Phase Update | The ICANN Organization understands recommendation 1 of SAC095 to mean that the SSAC recommends that the ICANN Board reject any TLD (root zone label) that includes emoji22-en). This understanding was confirmed by sent to the SSAC on 18 August 2017. The ICANN Board considered this item at ICANN60 in Abu Dhabi: https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2017-11-02-en#1.e. The ICANN org is currently reviewing the resolution for required next steps.22 June 2017. |
30 Nov | Phase 45 | Phase Change | Now in Phase 45: ImplementClose | ||||||||
02 Nov | Phase 32 | Board UpdateResolved (2017.11.02.09), the Board hereby directs that conformance to IDNA2008 and its successor will continue to be a necessary condition to determine valid IDN TLD labels. Resolved (2017.11.02.10), the Board requests that the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) and the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) engage with the SSAC to more fully understand the risks and consequences of using a domain name that includes emoji in any of its labels, and inform their respective communities about these risks. Resolved (2017.11.02.11), the Board requests that the ccNSO and GNSO integrate conformance with IDNA2008 and its successor into their relevant policies so as to safeguard security, stability, resiliency and interoperability of domain names. Resolved (2017.11.02.12), the Board directs the ICANN CEO, or his designee(s), to engage with gTLD and ccTLD communities on the findings and recommendations in SAC095. See full resolution at and scorecard at Understanding | The ICANN organization understands this is the SSAC's response to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group Community Comment 2. The respective public comment period closed on 22 May 2017. A Report of Public Comments will be published on 12 June 2017 and this comment will be included in that consideration (https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutionspublic-comments/cc2-new-gtld-subsequent-procedures-2017-1103-0222-en#1.e.en). There is no action for the ICANN Board. | ||||||||
31 Aug | Phase 32 | Phase Update | ICANN received SSAC's approval of understanding and is in the process of evaluating the advice. | Understanding sent to SSAC | |||||||
31 Aug | Phase 32 | Phase Change | Now in Phase 32: Evaluate & Consider | ||||||||
| Phase 2 | AP Feedback | SSAC confirmed Understanding. | ||||||||
| Understand | |||||||||||
30 | Phase 21 | Phase Update | The ICANN Organization understands recommendation 1 of SAC095 to mean that the SSAC recommends that the ICANN Board reject any TLD (root zone label) that includes emoji. This understanding was sent to the SSAC on 8 June 2017. | ||||||||
| Phase 2 | Board Understanding | The ICANN Organization understands recommendation 1 of SAC095 to mean that the SSAC recommends that the ICANN Board reject any TLD (root zone label) that includes emoji. | ||||||||
| Phase 2 | Phase Update | Understanding sent to SSAC for review. | ||||||||
| Phase 2 | Phase Change | Now in Phase 2: Understand | ||||||||
| ICANN acknowledged receipt of Advice | |||||||||||
25 | Phase 1 | Phase Update | SSAC published SAC095SAC094: SSAC Advisory on the Use of Emoji in Domain NamesResponse to the Request for Advice Relating to the 2012 New gTLD Round. Link: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-095094-en.pdf. |
