Page History
...
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Crystal Ondo (RrSG), Keiron Tobin (RrSG), John Woodworth (ISPCP) Alternates: Jothan Frakes (RrSG), Jody Kolker (RrSG) |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Chat Transcript (see Zoom recording→chat tab) GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Note | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notes/ Action Items
ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK:
Ongoing Action Items:
Action Items from 29 November:
Notes:
3. Recommendation 15
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 15 -- Staff to update the rationale for Recommendations 3 and 4 to reflect the further consideration of the WG, and also update the Working Document for Recommendation 15. 4. Transfer Restriction After Inter-Registrar Transfer – Recommendation 17 (Public Comment Review Tool and Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com])
5. Format of Transfer Policy Section 1.A.3.7 – Recommendation 18 (Public Comment Review Tooland Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com]) a) Proposed Edit:
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 18, a) Proposed Edit – Staff will split the two sentences and revise the language of the first sentence to add “upon request” as relating to the phrase “the potential Gaining Registrar with the reason for denial”. b) Additional Consideration:
Discussion:
6. Revised Reasons that a Registrar of Record MAY Deny a Transfer – Recommendation 19 (Public Comment Review Tool and Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com]) a) Concern:
Discussion:
c) Proposed edits: I.A.3.7.1 Potential next step: Consider whether “violation of registrar’s anti-abuse policies, or evidence of fraud” in the MAY category is an appropriate compromise. In brief, the alternatives presented in the comments: In the MAY category:
In the MUST category:
Additional proposal: Move “Evidence of fraud” to the MUST category and include “violation of the Registrar’s domain use or anti-abuse policies” in the MAY category. Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 19, c) Proposed edits: I.A.3.7.1: WG members to review with their groups and suggest language to accommodate the public comments. |