Page History

...

This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures approved 7 April 2011 for the GNSO Council. http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-op-procedures-08apr11-en.pdf^{Image Removed}

For convenience:

...

1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the GNSO Operating Procedures:
•21 July minutes--approved on 8 August 2011.

Item 2: GNSO Pending Projects List (5 minutes)

Standard agenda item looking at changes made to the GNSO's Pending Projects list since the previous meeting.
Refer to Pending Projects list http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf^{Image Removed}

2.1 Changes to Pending Projects List since last Council meeting (Stéphane Van Gelder)

...

At its July 21 meeting, the Council considered a motion to address IRTP Part B recommendation #3. This motion was deferred following a request from one of the GNSO groups, and as the GNSO Council has a practice of honoring such requests, the motion is being considered at this meeting.
Refer to motion 1

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011^{Image Removed}

3.1 Reading of the motion (Tim Ruiz)
3.2 Discussion
3.3 Vote

...

As part of the IRTP, Staff has produced an issue report on part C of this work. The report recommends that a PDP be initiated on the issues addressed in the report. A motion is being made to proceed with the PDP on IRTP-C and create a WG to tackle this work.
.
Refer to motion: 2

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011^{Image Removed}

4.1 Reading of the motion (Tim Ruiz)
4.2 Discussion
4.3 Vote

...

A motion is being made to that effect, to be considered only if the first IRTP-C motion passes.
Refer to motion 3

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011^{Image Removed}

4.4 Reading of the motion (Tim Ruiz)
4.5 Discussion
4.6 Vote

...

The proxy voting section of the GNSO Council Operating Procedures have been updated and put out for public comment. The OSC (Operations Steering Committee) has analyzed the comments received and a motion is being submitted for the GNSO Council to approve this updated text.
Refer to motion 4

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011^{Image Removed}

5.1 Reading of the motion (Wolf-Ulrich Knoben)
5.2 Discussion
5.3 Vote

...

It should be noted that the motion made before the Council today has been slightly reworked as compared to the motion shown at the July 21 meeting (see https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2011^{Image Removed}).

Refer to motion 5

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011^{Image Removed}

6.1 Reading of the motion (Zahid Jamil)
6.2 Discussion
6.3 Vote
Item 7: Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support (JAS) (15 minutes)

...

With this in mind, the JAS WG is presenting its final report for GNSO Council consideration.
Refer to Board June 20 2011 motion on new gTLDs: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-20jun11-en.htm^{Image Removed}

Refer to motion 6 https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011^{Image Removed}

7.1 Reading of the motion (Rafik Dammak)

...

Refer to Board resolution: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#6^{Image Removed}
In order to fulfill this work as requested by the Board,
the WG is proposing 2 models:

...

A motion is being considered to agree on a way forward.

Refer to motion: 7 https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011^{Image Removed}

8.1 Reading of the motion (Rosemary Sinclair)
8.2 Discussion
8.3 Vote

...

A motion is being made to recommend action by the ICANN Board with regards to addressing Internet-based criminal activity.

Refer to motion: 8 https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011^{Image Removed}

9.1 Reading of the motion (Tim Ruiz)
9.2 Discussion

...

A motion is being submitted to approve the formation of a Whois Survey Drafting Team.
Refer to motion: 9 https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011^{Image Removed}

10.1 Reading of the motion (Wendy Seltzer)
10.2 Discussion
10.3 Vote

Item 11: June 20 Board resolution on new gTLDs (15 minutes)

As part of its resolutions on the new gTLD program, the ICANN Board passed a resolved clause during its June 20 meeting in Singapore which contained the following excerpt (Resolved 1.b):

Refer to Board June 20 2011 motion on new gTLDs:

[http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-20jun11-en.htm ^{Image Removed}
]

Incorporation of text concerning protection for specific requested Red Cross and IOC names for the top level only during the initial application round, until the GNSO and GAC develop policy advice based on the global public interest.

The GNSO Council discussed this at its July 21 meeting. A position paper has been put forward by Staff and this is being discussed today.

Refer to position paper /letter

Letter from letter was sent by Kurt Pritz to Heather Dryden & Stéphane van Gelder to provide some guidance:

[http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/pritz-to-dryden-11aug11-en.pdf^{Image Removed}-en.pdf
]

On September 18, the GAC sent a letter to the GNSO Council providing advice on this topic:

 GAC Advice

1) possible UDRP
http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/dryden-to-van-gelder-udrp-14sep11-en.pdf

2) the IOC and Red Cross/Red Crescent
http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/dryden-to-van-gelder-red-cross-14sep11-en.pdf

The Council should now discuss next steps and possible courses of action, starting with an answer to the GAC.

11.1 Discussion

11.2 Next steps

Item 12. Any Other Business (5 minutes)

...