Page History
...
For other times: http://tinyurl.com/h4szuf3
The proposed agenda
- Roll call/updates to Statements of Interest (SOI)
- Agree on follow up questions to TM-PDDRP providers on joint complaints/consolidation
- Complete WG discussion of Issues/Concerns with TM-PDDRP document
- Agree on next steps/timeline for TM-PDDRP review
- Review WG timeline for Phase One
- Next steps/next meeting
For Agenda Item #2, we hope to circulate some language for your consideration shortly.
For Agenda Item #3, please refer to the Issues/Concerns document we used last week, available on the WG wiki at https://community.icann.org/x/PgabAw (where you will also find the transcript and recording from the call last week). In particular, as regards the possible development of “use cases” for the TM-PDDRP, we refer you to WG Member Darcy Southwell’s question that she had posed to the list: “Do we have specific examples of registry behavior that doesn’t meet existing standards but is nonetheless concerning when it comes to profiting from sale of infringing domains?”
Documents (for the call): Updated TM-PDDRP Issues Document (from 21 July)
FOLLOW UP: Draft PDDRP provider & community survey questions - updated 5 August and WG Member Issues Concerns & Suggestions for TM-PDDRP - updated 5 August 2016
Apologies: Christopher Thomas, Heather Forrest, Marie Pattullo, Lillian FosterisChristopher Thomas, Heather Forrest, Marie Pattullo, Lillian Fosteris, Kristine Dorrain, Darcy Southwell, J. Scott Evans , Steve Levy, Renee Reuter
Audio only: Sarah Deutsch