Page History
...
Item 3: Consent agenda (0 minutes)
Item 4: MOTION –
...
Initiation of a Policy Development Process (PDP) on the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D (10 minutes)
Description of motion
The Council requested an Issue Report on Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D at its meeting on 17 October 2012. The Final Issue Report was submitted to the GNSO Council on 8 January 2013. The Council is now requested to consider the initiation of a PDP on the issues outlined in the Final Issue Report.
Link to motion
4.1 Reading of the motion (ProposerMason Cole).
4.2 Discussion of motion and next steps.
4.3 Vote (Standard threshold: simple majority of each house).Initiate a PDP: an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House)
Item 5: MOTION –
...
Motion for Approval of a Charter for the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Working Group (WG)(10 minutes)
Description of motion
Normally, when a PDP is initiated, the Council convenes a DT to draft a charter for the work to be carried out. In this instance, in the interest of efficiency and because the issues laid out in the IRTP-D Final Issues Report are very precise, it is being suggested that the Council adopt the charter as proposed and request that this work be started by a WG asap. A motion is being made to that effect, to be considered only if the first IRTP-D motion passes.
Link to motion
5.1 Reading of the motion (ProposerMason Cole).
5.2 Discussion of motion and next steps.
5.3 Vote (Standard threshold: simple majority of each house).Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House)
Item 6: INFORMATION & DISCUSSION - GNSO Council Review and SIC Update (15 minutes)
In Toronto, the Chair of the SIC provided an overview of a new framework for future independent review efforts at ICANN. The GNSO was used as a case study to describe the effort because it is the first Supporting Organization lined-up in the next review cycle. Staff will brief the Council on the set of criteria metrics for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies, and the work underway to develop metrics for the Council and the Working Group Model of policy. (link to presentation: http://gnso.icann.org/en/node/35555)
6.1 Update from Staff (Rob HogarthHoggarth)
6.2 Discussion
6.3 Next Steps
Item 7: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) Strawman Proposal and Defensive Registrations Discussion (20 Minutes)
...
The Council is to continue to discuss: (i) a response to the ICANN CEOs request, and (ii) to consider whether to undertake any additional work related to the BC/IPC proposal and/or the Staff briefing paper, on the topic of second level defensive registrations.
7.1 Update1 Update
7.2 Discussion
7.3 Next Steps
Item 8: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - Response to the GAC Letter (20 minutes)
...
Item 9: INFORMATION & DISCUSION – Policy vs. Implementation (20 minutes)
The recent letter from the GAC as well as activities relating to work on the Trademark Clearinghouse, highlights a broader issue regarding the boundary between policy development and implementation work as well as the effective integration of policy development and integration work from the outset.
Recent discussions on the Council mailing list indicate that there is an interest to undertake further work on this issue. At the same time, ICANN Staff has published a paper (include link when available
(http://gnso.icann.org/en/node/36239) that is intended to facilitate further community discussions on this topic.
...
9.3 Next steps
Item 10: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - ATRT2 Developments (5 minutes)
...
10.1 Update (Wolfe-Ulrich Knoben)
10.2 Discussion
10.3 Next steps
Item 11: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - Whois Privacy and Proxy Relay and Reveal Study (10 minutes)
At the ICANN Meeting in Toronto, Lyman Chapin presented the results of the survey that evaluated the feasibility of conducting a future in-depth study into communication Relay and identity Reveal requests sent for gTLD domain names registered using Proxy and Privacy services (http://toronto45.icann.org/meetings/toronto2012/presentation-whois-survey-17oct12-en.pdf). The Council should consider whether to go ahead with the study.
11.1 – Update from Staff (Barbara Roseman)
11.2 – Discussion
11.3 – Next steps
Item 12: Any Other Business (5 minutes)
...
For other places see: http://www.timeanddate.com
http://tinyurl.com/ado9n7t
