Page History
...
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS |
Info |
---|
RECORDINGS GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Tip |
---|
PARTICIPATION Attendance-CRM Apologies: |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Action Item: Staff to send a consensus call email to the SSC on the list on its selection of the candidate and put it out for non-objection for 24 hours. (DONE) Notes: Proposed Agenda SSC Meeting – 12 October 2021
2. Review of poll results – SubPro ODP Liaison (see attached file) 8 responses in the survey (additional response provided verbally, see below) Q3 Based on the EOI materials and your own knowledge about the candidates, please rate the candidates' understanding of the specific and limited nature of the role and ability to perform liaison duties with the necessary restraint. Scores: Sebastien: 8.63 Cheryl: 7.88 Jeff: 9.25 Q4 Comments about candidates' understanding of the specific and limited nature of the role and ability to perform liaison duties with the necessary restraint. Summary: Overall positive. Q5 Based on the EOI materials and your own knowledge about the candidates, please rate the candidates' previous involvement with the SubPro PDP and in-depth knowledge of the subject matter. Scores: Sebastien: 7.13 Cheryl: 8.00 Jeff: 9.88 Q6 Comments about the candidates' previous involvement with the SubPro PDP and in-depth knowledge of the subject matter. Summary: Overall positive and brief. Q7 Based on the EOI materials and your own knowledge about the candidates, please rate the candidates' demonstrated ability to act in a neutral manner, especially when there are divergent views within the GNSO. Scores: Sebastien: 8.25 Cheryl: 8.00 Jeff: 9.00 Q8 Comments about candidates' demonstrated ability to act in a neutral manner. Summary: Overall positive and brief. Q9 Based on the EOI materials and your own knowledge about the candidates, please rate the candidates' familiarity with both the dynamics and the operations of the GNSO Council. Scores: Sebastien: 8.63 Cheryl: 7.75 Jeff: 9.25 Q10 Comments about the candidates' familiarity with both the dynamics and the operations of the GNSO Council. Summary: Some comments about the specific roles the candidates have played. Q11 Based on the EOI materials and your own knowledge about the candidates, please rate the candidates' availability to devote the necessary time to this effort, including attending meetings with the ODP team upon request and providing regular updates to the Council. Scores: Sebastien: 8.38 Cheryl: 8.00 Jeff: 9.00 Q12 Comments about the candidates' availability to devote the necessary time to this effort. Summary: Some comments on availability. Q13 Additional comments Summary: Overall positive. Note: Oswaldo Novoa’s comments did not get captured in the survey/poll, but they were consistent with the results of the survey. 3. Discussion and selection – SubPro ODP Liaison -- We’ve been really clear on the limitations of this role; should be really clear what the role is and its limitations when it is initiated. Can the SSC raise this suggestion to the Council leadership, particularly that this is a neutral role? -- Making such a suggestion may not be in scope of the role of the SSC, but Tatiana can informally raise it with leadership and ask for guidance. Next Steps: -- Staff to send a consensus call email to the SSC on the list on its selection of the candidate and put it out for non-objection for 24 hours. -- Staff to draft a motion for leadership review. -- Carlton to submit the motion by the document and motion deadline of 17 October 2021. 4. AOB: None. |
Note |
Notes/ Action Items |