Page History
...
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair) 3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes) a. Legal Committee Update 4. Discussion of models for inclusion / recommendation in Initial Report a) CPH Proposal b) Mark SV slides c) EPDP Team reactions d) Possible alternative approaches e) Confirm next steps 5. Commence review of input received on draft Initial Report a. See issues list – https://community.icann.org/x/BQZxBw b. Confirm next steps 6. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes): a) Thursday 23 January 2020 at 14.00 UTC b) Confirm action items c) Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS Meeting Audio Cast (for observers) To join the event, click on the link: Listen in browser: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01 Listen in application such as iTunes: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01.m3u |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Margie Milam (BC) Joining late: Georgios.Tselentis Alternates: Steve DelBianco (BC) |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Notes & Action items These high-level notes are designed to help the EPDP Team navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/ZwPVBQ. EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #40 Proposed Agenda Thursday, 16 January 2020 at 14.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair) a. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes) b. Legal Committee Update
3.Discussion of models for inclusion / recommendation in Initial Report - A small team met twice yesterday to discuss the CPH proposal - There was one clear agreement and understanding – when it comes to initial steps related to accreditation -these functions should be automated to the extent possible. - CPH proposal could constitute a good basis for the work. However, some groups (GAC, BC, IPC) consider that CPH proposal is not going far enough, and the preferred option would be a fully centralized system. Discussed the possibility of a more dynamic approach, wherein the disclosure could be done in a combination of ways – some full y automated and some could be fully manual due to the nature of the disclosure request. The smaller group will continue online deliberations and submit a proposal before the next meeting on Thursday, 23 January. - Awaiting GAC’s proposal for accreditation for law enforcement - Aim is to formulate evolution and transformation as we go – currently, the aim is to solve how to put this in writing
4.Commence review of input received on draft Initial Report 5. See issues list – https://community.icann.org/x/BQZxBw
6. Confirm next steps
|