Page History
...
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Susan Payne, Cyntia King |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Actions: By Tuesday, 26 February at 17:00 UTC (see instructions in previous email), the Sub Team is tasked to:
Instructions:
Source Documents: Newly Assigned 1. ICANN Org-maintained list of Registry Operators and relevant dates for Sunrise, Trademark Claims and other specific approved program periods (e.g. Limited Registration Periods, Qualified Launch Programs): https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/sunrise-claims-periods [newgtlds.icann.org] 2. Data Sub Team Meeting with Jon Nevett (DONUTS) at ICANN61:https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79438928/Transcription%20ICANN61%20GNSO%20RPM%20Data%20Sub%20Team%20Meeting%2010%20March%202018.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1521579214000&api=v2 Previously Assigned 1. Registry Operator Responses to Initial Survey from TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Registry%20Responses%20to%20TMCH%20Data%20Sub%20Team%20-%2013%20Dec.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1485897782000&api=v2 2. Deloitte responses to initial questions from TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Deloitte%20responses%20to%20TMCH%20Data%20Gathering%20Sub%20Team%20questions%20-%20Jan%202017.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1485897782000&api=v2 3. Deloitte TMCH Report: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170311/e28abe0e/ICANNTMCHreport_Feb2017-0001.pdf 4. Response to follow up questions - Apr 2017: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170414/4591dc7c/DeloitteResponsestoFollowUpQuestions-0001.pdf 5. Analysis Group Independent Review of TMCH Services: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Analysis%20Group%20Revised%20TMCH%20Report%20-%20March%202017.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1490349029000&api=v2 6. AG Response to follow up questions - June 2017: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2017-June/002043.html 7. AG Response to follow up questions - July 2017: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170727/06a0c33e/ResponsesfromAGtoFollowUpQuestions-27July2017-0001.pdf 8. INTA Survey Final Report by Nielsen (including the original survey questions in the appendix):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61606864/INTA%20Cost%20Impact%20Report%20revised%204-13-17%20v2.1.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1500376749000&api=v2 9. Lori Schulman’s Presentation to the CCT RT (May 2017):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61606864/ICANN%20New%20gTLD%20Survey%20Update%2010May%20Final.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1501098808000&api=v2 10. Lori Schulman’s Presentation to the RPM WG (August 2017):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69277722/INTA%20New%20gTLD%20Cost%20Impact%20Study%20Presentation%20-%2030%20Aug.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1504147055000&api=v2 Google Docs:
Notes: 1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates provided. 2. Review the INTA New gTLD Impact Study Survey Result with respect to the Claims Charter Questions: a. Claims Charter Question 1: -- Whose marks are we trying to protect? If we are talking about really big companies having more brands to protect, that might explain the response -- as to whether the data is biased. -- Not sure that there is evidence that the claims of large TM owners and small TM owners are the same. b. Claims Charter Questions 2, 3, 4 & 5 -- New comments will be added by George Kirikos and others who may have them. |