Page History
...
For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y9pudsyl
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA 1) Roll Call/SOI Updates 2) Continue deliberation beyond "minimum public data set" a) Charter Question: "What data should be collected, stored and disclosed?" focusing on identifying set of data required in the RDS first b) See annotated poll results from 25 July call c) Deliberate on key concepts for Registrant Email Address and other contact methods d) Overview of EWG Report Contacts Concepts: PBC-Overview-1August.pdf e) Deliberate on "roles" that were broadly supported: Admin, Tech, Abuse, Privacy/Proxy 3) Confirm action items and proposed decision points 4) Confirm next meeting date: 8 August 16.00 UTC BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS
|
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: James Galvin, Steven Metalitz, Marika Konings (Staff) |
Note |
---|
Note |
Notes/ Action Items Action Items:
ICANN staff: |
Notes: These high-level notes are designed to help PDP WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki above. 1) Roll Call/SOI Updates
2) Continue deliberation beyond "minimum public data set" a) Charter Question: "What data should be collected, stored and disclosed?" focusing on identifying set of data required in the RDS first b) See annotated poll results from 25 July call
WG Agreement #26: RDS policy must include a definition for every gTLD registration data element including both a semantic definition and (by reference to appropriate standards) a syntax definition.
WG Agreement #27: At least one element identifying the domain name registrant (i.e., registered name holder) must be collected and included in the RDS.
WG Agreement #28: Data enabling at least one way to contact the registrant must be collected and included in the RDS.
(Revised) WG Agreement #29: At a minimum, one or more e-mail addresses must be collected for every domain name included in the RDS, for contact roles that require an e-mail address for contactability
ACTION ITEM: Leadership to develop new poll question(s) based on Q6 discussion to re-poll on concepts raised
WG Agreement #31: At least one element enabling contact must be based on an open standard and not a proprietary communication method. Action Item: Staff to incorporate the above WG agreements in the working document:
c) Deliberate on key concepts for Registrant Email Address and other contact methods
Action Item: Staff to redistribute slides from Marrakech meeting drawn from SAC054, to kick off on-list discussion of what it means to be "in the RDS."
d) Overview of EWG Report Contacts Concepts: PBC-Overview-1August.pdf
e) Deliberate on "roles" that were broadly supported: Admin, Tech, Abuse, Privacy/Proxy (deferred, pick up next week) 3) Confirm action items and proposed decision points Action Items:
Working Group Agreements:
|
Notes/ Action Items4) Confirm next meeting date: 8 August 16.00 UTC |