Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

3.1 Presentation of procedure (Stéphane Van Gelder)
http://gnso.icann.org/en/issuesdrafts/gnso-council-chair-election-13jul12-en.pdf

3. 2 Discussion

3. 3 Call to approve procedure.

...

As the .com agreement has now been renewed (see http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-23jun12-en.htm#2), the Council may not want to wait until November before a Drafting Team is formed to develop a charter for the 'thick' Whois Policy Development Process Working Group (PDP WG).

4.1 Update from staff (X YMarika Konings)

4. 2 Discussion

4. 3 Next steps.

Item 5: Whois RT Review Team Final Report (10 minutes)

Considering the Board resolution on the Whois Review Team Final Report and the Board's call for input from the GNSO by August 31, 2012, how should the Council respond?

5.1 Update from staff (X YMargie Milam)

5. 2 Discussion

5. 3 Next steps.

Item 6: GNSO Review   Next Steps for Defensive Registrations. (10 minutes)

At the wrap-up in Prague, there was discussion around forming a small group to examine possible actions ahead of the 2013 ICANN bylaws-mandated review. This is a discussion item to determine whether the Council wishes to move ahead in this way.

Staff has delivered a briefing paper http://gnso.icann.org/en/node/32287 to the GNSO Council on the topic of defensive registrations at the second level in response from a request from the New GLTD Committee (2012.04.10.NG2).  The New GTLD Committee  requests the GNSO to consider whether additional work on defensive registrations at the second level should be undertaken.   The Council to discuss the next steps for this effort, in light of other related work (IGO Issue Report/Red Cross/IOC).

6.1          Update from Staff (Brian Peck6.1 Update from staff (X Y)
6.2          Discussion
6. 3 3          Next steps.Steps

 


Item 7: Impact of new gTLD program on existing GNSO structure (10 minutes)

The new gTLD program may impact the GNSO's Contracted Parties. This item aims to initiate a discussion of potential issues to look at as the new gTLD program comes online and the Registry and Registrar stakeholder groups are affected by this.

7.1 DiscussionItem 8: Management of work (10 minutes)

Recent discussions on the Council list have raised concerns about the volume of documents published prior to an ICANN meeting and how these can best be managed by the volunteer community that makes up the GNSO Council as it struggles to read a substantial amount of reports and other documents in order to better inform its own decision making processes with regards to policy.

8.1 Discussion

Item 9: Fake Renewal Notices (10 minutes)

The GNSO Council requested that a small group prepare a request for information concerning Fake Renewal Notices for the Registrar Stakeholder Group to help inform its deliberations on the Registration Abuse Policies Working Group (RAP WG) Recommendation on Fake Renewal Notices (#2). The drafting team submitted its report to the GNSO Council on 6 March 2012. Following a presentation of the report to the GNSO Council at the ICANN Meeting in Costa Rica, the GNSO Council decided to put the report out for public comment. A public comment forum was opened (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/fake-renewal-notices-report-21mar12-en.htm) and has now closed. At its last meeting, the GNSO Council requested the Drafting Team (DT) to review the comments received, update the report if deemed appropriate and report back accordingly. The DT has reviewed the comments received and submitted its updated report to the GNSO Council on 21 June 2012 (see http://gnso.icann.org/issues/frn/fake-renewal-notices-updated-report-20jun12-en.pdf).

97.1 Presentation of updated Fake Renewal Notices Report (Mikey O'Connor)
http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/report-frn-update-redline-20jun12-en.pdf

79.2 Discussion

97.3 Next steps

Item 108: Internationalised Registration Data WG Final Report (10 minutes)

...

This agenda item is to discuss next steps in light of this commitment, and to determine how the Council wishes to review and report on the IRD recommendations that may have policy implications.

108.1 Update from Staff (Margie Milam).

10.1 Discussion.

10.1 Next steps.

Julie Hedlund).
http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/ird/final-report-recommendations-20jul12-en.pdf

8.1 Discussion.

8.1 Next steps.

 

Item 9: GNSO Review (10 minutes)

At the wrap-up in Prague, there was discussion around forming a small group to examine possible actions ahead of the 2013 ICANN bylaws-mandated review. This is a discussion item to determine whether the Council wishes to move ahead in this way.

9.1 Report from the small group who offered to examine possible actions ahead.

9.2 Update from staff (Rob Hoggarth)

9.3 Discussion

9.4 Next steps.

Item 10: Management of work (10 minutes)

Recent discussions on the Council list have raised concerns about the volume of documents published prior to an ICANN meeting and how these can best be managed by the volunteer community that makes up the GNSO Council as it struggles to read a substantial amount of reports and other documents in order to better inform its own decision making processes with regards to policy.

10.1 Discussion

Item 11:  Any Other Business (5 minutes)

...

4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee votes according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may become available.
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be a quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local time between March and October, Summer in the NORTHERN hemisphere
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 11:00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
California, USA (PDT) UTC-8+1DST 04:00
New York/Washington DC, USA (EDT) UTC-5+1DST 07:00
Buenos Aires, Argentina (ART) UTC-3+0DST 08:00
Montevideo, Uruguay (UYT) UTC-3+0DST 08:00
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+1DST 12:00
Abuja,Nigeria (WAT) UTC+1+0DST 12:00
Tunis, Tunisia (CET) UTC+1+0DST 12:00
Bonn, Germany (CEST) UTC+1+1DST 13:00
Paris, France (CEST) UTC+1+1DST 13:00
Ramat Hasharon, Israel(IST) UTC+2+0DST 14:00
Karachi, Pakistan (PKT ) UTC+5+0DST 16:00
Beijing/Hong Kong, China (HKT ) UTC+8+0DST 19:00
Tokyo, Japan (JST) UTC+9+0DST 20:00
Wellington, New Zealand (NZDT ) UTC+12+0DST 23:00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2012, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with exceptions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com and http://tinyurl.com/ccz4c9u