Versions Compared

Old Version 3

changes.mady.by.user Marika Konings

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Marika Konings

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

The next meeting of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part C PDP Working Group is scheduled for Tuesday 21 February at 1500 UTC for 60 minutes.

07:00 PST, 10:00 EST, 12:00 Buenos Aires/Rio de Janeiro, 15:00 London, 16:00 CET, 18:00 Khartoum (EAT), 20:00 Karachi (PKT)

Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/irtppartc/

For those of you using Adobe Connect for the first time, please find a short introduction video here: https://admin.adobe.acrobat.com/_a227210/participatemeeting/

Proposed Agenda:

  1. Agenda Review
  2. Roll call / SOI
  3. Call for volunteers – data gathering sub-team / ideal process for change of control sub-team
  4. Review background briefing for meeting with the ccNSO (see attached)
  5. Ideal Process for 'Change of Control' - Requirements overview (sub-team: James, Michele, Mikey, Simonetta)
  6. Continue deliberations on Charter Question A, taking into account agreed upon approach (see https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/Mind+maps+of+teleconference+discussions for latest version of work plan)
  7. Next steps / Confirm next meeting

For review:

Action items – IRTP Part C WG Meeting 14 February 2012

  • Public Comment Review Tool: Review latest version of public comment review tool (see https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/Next+Meeting) – deadline Friday 17 February (All)
  • Data Gathering Sub-Team: The WG decided to create a sub team that would be dedicated to gather further data and information in relation to charter question B and C. This data gathering effort should focus on 'further input or data in relation to the incidence of this issue to determine its scope and the most appropriate way to address it' in relation to charter question B and C and ' specific information as to where proprietary IDs are currently being used by registries and whether the use of IANA IDs instead would be preferred / beneficial' in relation to charter question C. Based on the data / information gathered by the sub-team, the WG will review whether new / additional sub-teams need to be created or the task of the existing sub-team needs to be enhanced. At this stage it is expected that most of the information / data will come from registries / registrars. Volunteers to date are James Bladel, Jonathan Tenenbaum, Roy Dykes and Simonetta Batteiger. If you are interested in joining this sub-team, please express your interest on the mailing list. (All)
  • Issue Report: Review the IRTP Part C Final Issue Report in relation to Charter Question A (see pages 13-17 -  http://gnso.icann.org/issues/issue-report-irtp-c-29aug11-en.pdf) 
  • Ideal Process for Charter Question A – As one of the tasks as outlined in the WG approach is to develop an outline of what the ideal process for a change of control should look like, some members of the WG have volunteered to take a stab at preparing a first outline of how such a process could look. A first, very initial draft, might be available for the next meeting. If there are any other volunteers, in addition to Mikey, James, Simonetta and Michele, please share your interest with the mailing list. (All)