Page History
...
For other places see: https://tinyurl.com/2ysbxuu7
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Steinar Grøtterød (At-Large), James Galvin (RySG) Alternates: Lutz Donnerhacke (At-Large), Beth Bacon (RrSG) |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Chat Transcript Transcript (see zoom recording / chat messages tab) GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Note | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notes/ Action Items
ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK:
Ongoing Action Items: Jothan Frakes, Jim Galvin, Jody Kolker, and Rick Wilhelm have volunteered to compile a list of attack vectors and how the recommendations solve for them, or where they are out of scope. Action Items from 01 December:
Notes:
2. Welcome and Chair Updates Summary of Process Updates from Staff sent to the list: Process updates
Open Items
Additional Updates:
3. Revised Reasons that a Registrar of Record MAY Deny a Transfer – Recommendation 19 (Public Comment Review Tooland Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com])
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 19: Small team to re-evaluate the language in Rec 19 -- WG members are -- Owen Smigelski, Sarah Wyld, Keiron Tobin, Zak Muscovitch, and Volker Greiman. See below. 4. New Reasons that a Registrar a Record MUST Deny a Transfer – Recommendation 20 (Public Comment Review Tooland Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com]) a) Concerns
Discussion:
b) Proposed Edit
Discussion:
5. Revised Reasons that a Registrar of Record MUST Deny a Transfer – Recommendation 21 (Public Comment Review Tooland Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com]) a) Concern regarding I.A.3.8.1 and I.A.3.8.2
Discussion:
6. Revised Reasons that a Registrar of Record MUST NOT Deny a Transfer – Recommendation 22 (Public Comment Review Tooland Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com]) a) Concern: Fees (I.A.3.9.1)
b) Concern: Sanctions
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 22, a) Concern: Fees and b) Concern: Sanctions: Staff to ensure that the rationale reflects the WG’s discussion and agreement. c) Concern: Other
Discussion:
c) Proposed Edit
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 22, c) Proposed edit: WG agrees to a revision to the Implementation Guidance as proposed in the Potential next step. d) Proposed edit
e) Proposed edit
Discussion:
AOB: Small Team for Recommendation 19: ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 19: Small team to re-evaluate the language in Rec 19 -- WG members are -- Owen Smigelski, Sarah Wyld, Keiron Tobin, Zak Muscovitch.
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 19: Sarah Wyld to send the proposed revised language and rationale to the WG list on behalf of the Small Team. |