Page History
...
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA Thursday 23 July 2020 at 14.00 UTC
2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair) 3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes) a. Expected approach for consensus designation and timeline: From the GNSO Working Group Guidelines: The recommended method for discovering the consensus level designation on recommendations should work as follows: i. After the group has discussed an issue long enough for all issues to have been raised, understood and discussed, the Chair, or Co-Chairs, make an evaluation of the designation and publish it for the group to review. ii. After the group has discussed the Chair's estimation of designation, the Chair, or Co-Chairs, should reevaluate and publish an updated evaluation. iii. Steps (i) and (ii) should continue until the Chair/Co-Chairs make an evaluation that is accepted by the group. iv. In rare case, a Chair may decide that the use of polls is reasonable. Some of the reasons for this might be: o A decision needs to be made within a time frame that does not allow for the natural process of iteration and settling on a designation to occur. o It becomes obvious after several iterations that it is impossible to arrive at a designation. This will happen most often when trying to discriminate between Consensus and Strong support but Significant Opposition or between Strong support but Significant Opposition and Divergence. Modified timeline:
4. Finalization of review of cannot live with items: a. Priority 2 related items
b. Any further items flagged after review of proposed approach for cannot live with items documented in google doc [docs.google.com]following 21/22 calls or following review of updated rec #8 language [docs.google.com] c. Category 2 items (groups to prioritize which items they would like to flag / discuss)
5. Wrap and confirm next steps (5 minutes): BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS Please note Support Staff is uploading discussion item documents as they are created. You can find the documents, including the previously-circulated discussion items here: Public Comment Review Tool & Discussion Drafts. See email invite with zoom webinar room URL for attendees (observers) |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
...
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Julf Helsingius (NCSG) Alternates: David Cake (NCSG) |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items ACTION ITEMS
EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #74 Proposed Agenda Thursday 23 July 2020 at 14.00 UTC
2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair) 3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes) a. Expected approach for consensus designation and timeline: From the GNSO Working Group Guidelines: The recommended method for discovering the consensus level designation on recommendations should work as follows:
iii. Steps (i) and (ii) should continue until the Chair/Co-Chairs make an evaluation that is accepted by the group. 3. In rare case, a Chair may decide that the use of polls is reasonable. Some of the reasons for this might be: o A decision needs to be made within a time frame that does not allow for the natural process of iteration and settling on a designation to occur. o It becomes obvious after several iterations that it is impossible to arrive at a designation. This will happen most often when trying to discriminate between Consensus and Strong support but Significant Opposition or between Strong support but Significant Opposition and Divergence. Modified timeline:
4. Finalization of review of cannot live with items: a. Priority 2 related items
Feasibility of Unique Contacts: “The EPDP Team received legal guidance that indicated that the publication of uniform masked email addresses results in the publication of personal data; which indicates that wide publication of masked email addresses may not be currently feasible under the GDPR. Further work on this issue is under consideration by the GNSO Council.
b. Any further items flagged after review of proposed approach for cannot live with items documented in google doc [docs.google.com] following 21/22 calls or following review of updated rec #8 language [docs.google.com]
c. Category 2 items (groups to prioritize which items they would like to flag / discuss) 5. Wrap and confirm next steps (5 minutes):
|