Page History
...
GNSO Council Meeting Audio Cast
Listen in browser: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream02 stream01
Listen in application such as iTunes: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream02stream01.m3u m3u
Councilors should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if they will not be able to attend and/or need a dial out call.
...
On 30 May 2019, Keith Drazek, the GNSO Chair provided an update to the EPDP Team on the expected next steps in relation to the ICANN Board’s action on Phase 1 recommendations and requested that the EPDP Team provide input to identify any questions, comments or concerns in relation to ICANN Board’s action on the EPDP Phase 1 Recommendations. Subsequently, on 9 June 2019, Janis Karklins, Chair of the EPDP, informed the GNSO Chair of the following preliminary input noting that there was not sufficient time to formalize and agree on an EPDP Team response:“• In
- “In relation to purpose 2, there is a general understanding for why the Board decided to not adopt this purpose and the EPDP Team confirms that it considers it firmly within its scope for phase 2 to further review this purpose in the context of the System for Standardized Access / Disclosure (SSAD);
- For recommendation #12, some additional context has been provided that may help explain the thinking behind the EPDP Team’s original recommendation. However, there is no agreement at this stage on whether or not the Board’s non-adoption should be supported.”
...
During the Council’s July 2019 meeting, the Council reviewed the draft letter to be sent to the ICANN Board and the EPDP Team. Based on the input received during the call as well as subsequently on the mailing list, Council leadership circulated a revised version for review on [date]Thursday, 15 August.
Here, the Council will review the revised letter to be sent to the ICANN Board.
...
During its meeting on 18 July 2019, the Council had an initial exchange of views on this topic which continued on the mailing list. Here the Council will take into consideration the input provided and decide how to substantively respond to the questions and concerns from ICANN Org. Keith Drazek circulated a draft response to the letter on 15 August 2019 [https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/draft-council-response-whois-accuracy-ars-letter-15aug19-en.pdf] Here the Council will take into consideration the input provided and decide how to substantively respond to the questions and concerns from ICANN Org.
5.1 – Introduction of topic (Council leadership)
...
On 10 June 2019, ICANN org communicated to the GNSO Council that the ICANN Board resolution passed on 1 March 2019 – seehttps://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2019-03-01-en [icann.org] - calls for a set of Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) Final Recommendations to be passed through to community groups. As articulated in the Board resolution, “recognizing that the Board has the obligation and responsibility to balance the work of ICANN in order to preserve the ability for ICANN org to serve its Mission and the public interest, the Board decided on three categories of action”:
...
The Council was specifically invited to review to pages 1-4 of the scorecardhttps://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/resolutions-final-cct-recs-scorecard-01mar19-en.pdf[icann.org] of the scorecardwhich compile pass-through recommendations, including the groups they are addressed to. The recommendations the ICANN Board resolved to pass through to the GNSO Council, in whole or in part, for its consideration:
...
An initial draft with the small team's proposed GNSO Council response to those 5 Recommendations passed through directly to the GNSO were circulated to the GNSO Council on 23 July for review and consideration [https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/proposed-council-response-cct-review-team-recommendations-23jul19-en.pdf]. An updated version was circulated on the 20 August 2019 [https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/proposed-council-response-cct-review-team-recommendations-15aug19-en.pdf].
Here the Council will consider the initial draft and receive an update on the feedback received from the PDP WGs to which recommendations were also passed through.
...
On 12 July 2019, ICANN org shared a proposed set of amendments focusing on establishing standardized processes for post-implementation consensus policy reviews and for amending the CPIF document on an ongoing basis with the GNSO Council [https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/gdd-consensus-policy-implementation-framework-12jul19-en.pdf]. In addition to a number of minor language updates, the following sections have been added to or created:
- Section Section V, “Support and Review”: Section expanded to reference the proposed post-implementation consensus policy review process added in the new Section VI
- Section VI, “Post-Implementation Consensus Policy Review Process”: New section added to detail proposed steps for carrying out reviews of implemented consensus policies
- Section VII, “Consensus Policy Implementation Framework Amendment Process”: New section added to detail proposed steps for amending the CPIF
...
8.1 – Introduction of topic (Brian Aitchison, GDD) Slide deck
8.2 – Council discussion
8.3 – Next steps
...
Item 9 - PDP 3.0 Small Group Update/Discussion (15 10 minutes)
The PDP 3.0 Small Team has completed five (5) out of fourteen (14) PDP 3.0 improvements so far. The rest of the nine (9) improvements are all in the pipeline with various levels of progress.
In advance of the 22 August Council meeting, the PDP 3.0 Small Team sent the following documents for four (4) completed PDP 3.0 improvements as the first deliverable to the GNSO Council for review. They are packaged together as they are concerned with the expectations, requirements, and/or participation methods for PDP working groups members and/or leaders.
...
- Improvement #1: Terms of participation for working group members [docs.google.com]
- Improvement #2: Consider alternatives to open working group model [docs.google.com]
- Improvement #3: Criteria for joining of new members after a PDP working group is formed or re-chartered
- Improvement #6: Document expectations for working group leaders (Chairs/Co- Chairs/Leads) that outlines role & responsibilities as well as minimum skills / expertise required [docs.google.com]
Updated Status document for PDP 3.0: PDP 3.0_Project List_20190822.pdf
Here the GNSO Council will consider the documents for four (4) completed PDP 3.0 improvements.
9.1 - Introduction of topic (Rafik Dammak) Presentation slide deck
9.2 - Council discussion
9.3 - Next steps
...
10.1 - ICANN66 Draft Schedule Review & travel booking reminderreminder https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/icann66-draft-gnso-schedule-21aug19-en.pdf
10.2 - GNSO Strategic Planning Session January 2020
10.3 - Confirmation of volunteers for Council liaisons to PDP/IRTs beginning at the AGM:
- Sebastian Ducos – EPDP IRT
- Maxim Alzoba - Translation/Transliteration IRT
- John McElwaine – RPMs PDP WG
10.4 - EPDP Phase 2 Work plan package (see https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/epdp-phase-2-project-management-work-plan-15aug19-en.pdf)
10.5 - ATRT3 Survey - volunteers to develop Council response to survey circulated on 20 August 2019 [https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2019-August/022978.html]
10.6 - Questions from the Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) PDP Working Group Co-Chairs [https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/beckham-et-al-to-gnso-council-rpm-pdp-liaison-19aug19-en.pdf] and GNSO Council leadership reply [https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/gnso-council-to-rpm-pdp-co-chairs-22aug19-en.pdf]
_______________________________
...
