Page History
...
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA 1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest 2. Select Sub Team Leader 3. Introduction to the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905 4. Begin survey analysis 5. AOB BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Susan Payne, Phil Corwin |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Actions:
Question 1 (Final Charter Questions for Trademark Claims) Is the Trademark Claims service having its intended effect? Consider the following questions specifically in the context both of a Claims Notice as well as a Notice of Registered Name: a) Is the Trademark Claims service having its intended effect of deterring bad-faith registrations and providing Claims Notice to domain name applicants? b) Is the Trademark Claims service having any unintended consequences, such as deterring good-faith domain name applications? Notes: 1. Statements of Interest: no updates. 2. Select Sub Team Leader: -- Cynthia King nominated Griffin Barnett, who is considering the nomination. -- Kristine Dorrain is considering whether to volunteer. -- Griffin and Kristin may consider whether to offering to Co-Lead the Sub Team. 3. Introduction to the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905 -- First tab (far left) is the content table. -- First column is the consolidated data from the survey results. Example: Actual & Potential Registrant Response: -- Column A: Questions based on the refined charter questions. -- Column B: Actual survey question (but without the logic). -- Some questions are asked of both actual and potential registrants, and some are related. -- Column C: Sub Team's draft question. -- Column D: Actual registrant response. -- Column E: Potential registrant response -- Column F: Findings from Analysis Group. -- Look at the table -- there are some dividers -- noting what relates to Trademark Claims and Sunrise. Discussion: -- The table ties back to the agreed charter questions. Once the analysis is done there may be information here that may be relevant to other charter questions. -- First, go through survey results. -- Then how or whether the survey results answer the agreed questions. -- How the survey results may answer other survey questions. -- Goal is to answer the charter questions. Don't get bogged down in analyzing the data. Focus on column A and how we get the answers. -- Question: What is in the tabs? That is the raw data/detailed responses. 4. Begin survey analysis: Second tab: Actual & Potential Registrants Column A: (reading the questions) Discussion: -- Based on the results it seems pretty clear that only half of the people who were not actual registrants answered the question about the notice correctly. Effectiveness and claims notice. -- Note that some respondents seem to have been deterred (worried). -- Claims notice: overarching question -- background question -- how much deterrence is acceptable? -- #4/#5: That is what row 14 is answering. Is the notice intimidating, not the service. -- Look at the survey analysis group outside of ICANN -- the meaning what the notice, half of the answers the distractor answers (wrong/unhelpful). Didn't understand the notice. -- Proposal: Take question 1, sub parts a and b, study those questions, and compare against the 3 tabs. |