Page History
The call for the RPM Sub Team for URS Providers: To develop and review questions for the URS providers will take place on Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 18:00 UTC for 90 minutes.
1110:00 PST, 1413:00 EST, 19:00 Paris CET, 23:00 Karachi PKT, (Thursday) 03:00 Tokyo JST, (Thursday) 05:00 Melbourne AEDT
For other times: https://tinyurl.com/yazhx87r
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS URS Procedure, URS Rules, URS Provider's MOU with ICANN and Supplemental Rules: https://community.icann.org/x/1Ri8B |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
AC RecordingTranscript |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Joining late: Apologies: Jonathan Agmon |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items ACTION ITEMS:
NOTES: I. Starting point for developing questions for URS Providers
II. Review of the URS Rules and propose questions 2. Communications (a)(b)
(c)
(f)
(g)
(j)
3. The Complaint (a)(b)
Discussion: We could check the forms Providers use for compatibility. (e)
Discussion: Not sure how much inferences we could draw if not many cases that abusive complaint was applied. Most of the cases have been won by the Complaint. Perhaps check the complaint abuse case database on the Provider's site? (g)
Discussion:
4. Notice of Complaint and Locking of Domain (b)
Discussion: Language question is covered in Rule 9 (c)
5. The Response (a) (iii)
(a) (iv) Discussion:
(a) (v)
(e)
Discussion: Sub Team should review how Providers handle this provision in their Supplemental Rules. (f)
(g)
(i)
Discussion:
(k) Discussion:
6. Examiner (a) ACTION: Staff to check whether the Providers maintain and make public available the list of URS examiners and their qualifications and present the findings (e.g., screenshots) before or during the next Sub Team meeting. (b)
Discussion:
7. Communication Between Parties and the Examiner Discussion: Sub Team will revisit this provision when reviewing Providers' Supplemental Rules.
8. General Powers of the Examiner (d)
|