Page History
The call for the Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) Sub Team for Data is scheduled on Friday, 26 January 2018 UTC at 17:00 UTC for 60 minute duration.
09:00 PST, 12:00 EST, 17:00 London, 18:00 Paris CET, (Saturday) 04:00 AEDT
For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y8mryq4f
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA 1. Complete discussion on Section 3 (TM/Brand Owners), page 23 et seq 2. Commence discussion on either Section 2 (Registrars) or Section 4 (Registrants) at Sub Team’s option 3. Timing of future meetings 4. AOB BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: none |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Action Items:
Notes: 1. Section 2, Registrars, Page 14, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNutoI/edit?usp=sharing Anecdotal Questions: If you offer(ed) pre-order for new gTLD domain names before the launch of GA, when was the Claims Notice submitted to the customer? -- Move to data questions. What, if any, challenges do you encounter when sending Claims Notices in respect of pre-order names. Were there any particular TLDs or types of TLDs where the operation of the Claims was technically or operationally difficult, or where Claims was otherwise problematic or unnecessary? Please explain. -- Variation: "What aspects of the Claims RPMs conflicted with your domain names sales/operations?" and/or "Is the way the claims period described in the RPM too prescriptive?" -- Edit to first bullet, "in respect of pre-order names or other operations?" Given the registration process that you operate, would it be feasible for you, to run surveys... -- Add “and/or your resellers” after “would it be feasible for you,” -- Would it be useful to gather data about the location of the Registrar? The language of the registration agreement might or might not correlate to the location of the registrar. May be useful??? |