Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

For other times: http://tinyurl.com/ha5xmk9The proposed agenda  

Agenda:

  1. Roll call (via Adobe Connect/audio bridge only); updates to Statements of Interest
  2. Finalize and agree on: (i) follow up questions to the three TM-PDDRP Providers; (ii) questions for proposed Community Survey; and (iii) follow up with ICANN Compliance
  3. Continue discussion on Issues/Concerns/Suggestions with the TM-PDDRP
  4. Initial Report from TMCH Sub Team
  5. Next steps/next meeting


Documents (for the call): 

For Agenda Item #2: List - Provider follow up, Community survey, and Compliance follow up (9 August)

For Agenda Item #3WG Member Issues Concerns & Suggestions for TM-PDDRP - REDLINE (9 August; updated from 5 August version; there is also a CLEAN VERSION for easier reading) 

For Agenda Item #4: Initial Report - TMCH Sub Team (9 August); new edits added here: Sub Team Initial Report - SP edits 10 August


FOLLOW UP: 

The following is the initial list of Action Items from the call held earlier today. Staff will send the second additional list of Action Items following confirmation of specific suggested language from the call transcript and recording.

Action Item #1:

  • Members who were on the call today approved the proposed set of follow up questions to be sent to the three TM-PDDRP Providers. Members who were not able to be on the call are kindly requested to review the attached questions and send any concerns or objections to this mailing list by Monday 15 August. We hope to send the questions out early next week, with a view to receiving the providers’ input by end-August.

Action Item #2:

  • Members who were on the call today approved the proposed list of questions for the ICANN community survey. Members who were not able to be on the call are kindly requested to review the attached questions and send any concerns or objections to this mailing list by Monday 15 August. We hope to create the survey and send out the link by the end of next week, with a view to receiving responses by Friday 16 September.

Action Item #3:

  • All members are invited to provide their view as to the scope of the mandate of the TMCH Sub Team. As noted on the call today, some Working Group and Sub Team members thought it would be appropriate for the Sub Team to catalogue all existing information and data they consider relevant, to be reported back to the full Working Group – this could include developing appropriate questions to be answered (based on those in the Working Group Charter and additional Working Group/community questions) and requesting materials from third parties (e.g. the TMCH Providers, registrars, others). The information sought could include not just materials that are easily accessible by public search but potentially also information that, while already in existence, will be provided by request. Other Working Group members thought that the Sub Team’s mandate was limited to gathering information and data that was already publicly available and reporting that back to the full Working Group – this would not include the Sub Team contacting third parties who may be able to provide additional data or materials.

 

 

  • To join the Sub Team, please contact the GNSO Secretariat at gnso-secs@icann.org with your request to be added to the list.

Action Item #4:

  • With thanks to those Members who have already completed the Doodle poll on mediation and burden of proof, Members who have not yet participated in the straw poll are kindly requested to do so by Friday 12 August: http://doodle.com/poll/nc8ydu8cbbywtabm.

Document: Final draft - TM-PDDRP Provider Questions  Community Survey - 10 August

Mp3

Transcript

AC Chat 

Attendance

Apologies: Phil Corwin, Heather Forrest,Phil Corwin, Heather Forrest, Jim Bikoff , Holly Lance, Christopher Thomas, Dawahi Khouloud, Paul Keating, Doug Isenberg, J Scott Evans,Rebecca Tushnet 

Audio only:  none