CCWG on Internet Governance

...

Questions to the Community

Questions suggested (in no particular order):

- Given the compressed time frame and participants’ varying interests and experiences in the Internet governance environment, the CCWG has experienced some teething problems, e.g. in agreeing a charter for its work, a statement for the NETmundial, etc. What does your group think is the potential value of the CCWG and the best way to advance cooperation therein? What should be its next priority after the NETmundial meeting has concluded?

Topic: NetMundial

NetMundial Brazil Meeting CCWG Document

The CCWG has made a contribution using bottom-up multi-stakeholder processes. Since it is an ICANN Working Group, most of the CCWG’s contribution focuses on ICANN.

- Key and unavoidable issues at the NETmundial meeting will be the globalization /denationalization of the IANA function and of ICANN. Governments and other stakeholders from around the world will be keen to assess the breadth and depth of ICANN community support for the I* organizations’ Montevideo Declaration and related statements by the ICANN board.

• Q1 - What is your group’s position on these issues?

- How can the CCWG and the ICANN community support multistakeholder cooperation and dialogue in other key settings, e.g. 1Net and especially the IGF?

• Q2 - Please Comment on the contribution

...

• the CCWG  has submitted to NetMundial -- focussing on the Roadmap

...

• . Please Comment on the contribution

...

• the CCWG has submitted to NetMundial -- focussing on the Principles
• Q3 - What are the additional points for the document the CCWG developed? Are there missing messages that needs to be elaborated? Are there any points that need to be expanded (e.g. to whom stakeholders are accountable? what makes a legitimate stakeholder)?

NetMundial – Brazil Meeting ICANN Involvement and deliverables

• Q4 - What does the ICANN community advise that ICANN’s participation should be at the Brazil meeting?
• Q5 - Which input, additional to the CCWG document, should ICANN community participants at NetMundial receive to better participate?
• Q6 - Which output is expected from ICANN community participants at NetMundial? Are there more specific recommendations?

...

• How should any output/input re: NetMundial be treated?
• Q7 - What

...

• happens after the NetMundial Brazil meeting? 

Topic: CCWG on Internet Governance

• Q8 - Given the compressed time frame and participants’ varying interests and experiences in the Internet governance environment, the CCWG has experienced some teething problems, e.g. in agreeing a charter for its work, a statement for the NETmundial, etc. What does your group think is the potential value of the CCWG and the best way to advance cooperation therein?
• Q9 - What should be the CCWG’s next priority after the NetMundial meeting has concluded?
• Q10 - How can the CCWG and the ICANN community support multistakeholder cooperation and dialogue in other key settings, e.g. 1Net and especially the IGF?
• Q11 - Which actions, if any, should ICANN avoid on its task of driving the public consultation on the IANA functions issue?

- What are the additional points for the document the CCWG developed? Are there missing messages that needs to be elaborated? Are there any points that need to be expanded?

- What does the Community expect the role of ICANN Staff/CEO; ICANN Board; ICANN Community Leaders will be during NetMundial? [As these can contribute the process in different ways, channels…]

...