Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Welcome
  2. Roll Call
  3. Statements of Interest
  4. Presentation from the Commercial Feasibility Study
  5. Presentation from the Expert Working Group on WHOIS IRD
  6. Responses From SO/ACs
  7. Refinements to Proposed Questions
  8. Presentation from the Commercial Feasibility StudyNext Steps
  9. AOB

...

Actions:

  1. Think about possible scenarios and check on those that the EWG used in its reports - pay attention to difference between literal and figurative translation
  2. Responses from SO/ACs:

    a) Staff will send reminders to the SOs/ACs to give responses as early as possible, or indicate if they need more time, or whether they want to join the PDP WG face-to-face meeting in Singapore;

    b) Rudi will reach out to Olivier concerning a meeting with the ALAC in Singapore.

    c) Rudi also will reach out to a colleague on the ccNSO.

  3. Study Group to Evaluate Available Solutions for the Submission and Display of Internationalized Contact Data: The WG will consider whether it will provide input on the survey that has gone out to the registrars and registries.

1.  Responses from SOs/ACs: Extended the deadline to the end of March.  Continue to review responses.

2.  Review Work Plan and consider next steps.

...

For Review:

18 March Whois RT IRD Singapore.pdf

23 March TNT Study Singapore Update 3PM.pdfFor Review: TBD

...

Proposed Questions:

  1.  What is contact information (review and expand on the taxonomies)?
  2. Why are we doing this?; is this particular feature necessary?
  3. Who gets access to what?
  4. Who are the stakeholders?; who is affected? and what do they want (linking back to What)?
  5. How much would a particular feature cost and how to weigh the costs versus the benefits?
  6. When would policy come into effect?
  7. What should be mandatory?
  8. What is the difference between verification and validation?

...