Page History
...
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
Next session: Tuesday 5 July at 16:00 UTC BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS |
...
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Steinar Grøtterød (At-Large), Jim Galvin (RySG) Alternates: Lutz Donnerhacke (At-Large), Beth Bacon (RySG) |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items
Action Items: None. Notes: Transfer Policy Review Phase 1(a) - Meeting #51 2. Welcome and Chair Updates - Thanking the group: Hit our first major milestone last week by publishing our Initial Report for Phase 1a for public comment on schedule. a. Call schedule for July and August 3. Review of Phase 1(b) charter topics and workplan See the specific charter questions at page 5 by topic with a summary here: Overall Policy 60-Day Lock: Change of Registrant – Privacy/Proxy Customers Designated Agent Additional Questions Change of Registrant Topics – timing: • Overall Policy (40 days, approximately 6 meetings) Discussion: High-level Discussion at ICANN74: Working document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gu4sXGvyJeWJIfvaK_I7GKA6lAdfKFPQKaN4UMgzmcE/edit Charter Question d1) According to the Transfer Policy Review Scoping Team Report, the Change of Registrant policy “does not achieve the stated goals” and “is not relevant in the current & future domain ownership system.” To what extent is this the case and why? Are the stated goals still valid? If the Change of Registrant policy is not meeting the stated goals and those goals are still valid, how should the goals be achieved? Discussion: Charter Question d2) Data gathered in the Transfer Policy Status Report indicates that some registrants find Change of Registrant requirements burdensome and confusing. If the policy is retained, are there methods to make the Change of Registrant policy simpler while still maintaining safeguards against unwanted transfers? Charter Question d3) The Transfer Policy Review Scoping Team Report suggests that there should be further consideration of establishing a standalone policy for Change of Registrant. According to the Scoping Team, the policy should take into account the use case where a Change of Registrar occurs simultaneously with a Change of Registrant. To what extent should this issue be considered further? What are the potential benefits, if any, to making this change? To what extent does the policy need to provide specific guidance on cases where both the registrar and registrant are changed? Are there particular scenarios that need to be reviewed to determine the applicability of COR? TPR Poll: 1. To what extent are changes to CoR requirements needed, taking into consideration changes to the landscape since the IRTP-C, available data, and/or personal experience? – 11 Responses Discussion: 2. Are the CoR goals discussed during ICANN74 valid for the purposes of future policy work? - 10 Responses Discussion: 3. Should the working group further explore the proposal to apply principles and processes developed in Phase 1a to CoR? – 11 Responses 4. Is the definition of what constitutes a Change of Registrant still appropriate or should it be changed? – 13 Responses For avoidance of doubt, nothing prevents the Registrar from treating any change to the Registrant Name or Registrant Organization field as a Material Change. Discussion: 5. Should CoR be a standalone policy or continue to be part of the Transfer Policy? – 12 Responses 5. AOB |