Page History

PROPOSED AGENDA

EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #43

Proposed Agenda

Thursday, 20 February 2020 at 14.00 UTC

       2.Confirmation of agenda (Chair)

      3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes)

          a.Update from legal committee

     4. Timeline review and priority 2 worksheet compilation (see attached) (20 minutes)

           a) Priority 2 worksheet compilation overview

           b) Consider input received to date

           c) EPDP team input

          d) Confirm volunteers for Automation Use Cases Small Team

          e) Confirm next steps

     5. Display of information of affiliated vs. accredited privacy / proxy providers [docs.google.com] (priority 2) (45 minutes)

          a. EPDP Team to review ICANN Org feedback

          b.Consider Support Staff proposed recommendation

          c. Confirm next steps

     6. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes):

          a. Thursday 27 February 2020 at 14.00 UTC (topics: data retention & feasibility of unique contacts to have a uniform anonymized email address)

          b. Confirm action items

          c. Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS

Next steps - priority 2 worksheets - updated 10Feb2020.pdf

Meeting Audio Cast (for observers)

To join the event, click on the link: 

Listen in browser:  http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01

Listen in application such as iTunes: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01.m3u 

Please review the latest version of the document (see https://community.icann.org/x/BhSJBw for the latest version) prior to the meeting and consider for each of the proposals the following question:

• Are disclosure decisions in these proposals technically feasible? If yes, how would this be done? If no, why not?
• Are disclosure decisions in these proposals legally permissible? If not, why not and what safeguards would need to be put in place that would make the proposals legally permissible? Are there specific legal questions that the legal committee should further consider that would provide further insight into the legal permissibility of these proposals?
• Considering the Belgian DPA input that “the GDPR would not prohibit the automation of various functions in an access model. It is not how the disclosure decision is made that matters, but to be able to demonstrate that any algorithm automating decision-making considers the criteria required for such a decision to be compliant with the GDPR”, what criteria would need to be in place to demonstrate compliance for each proposal?
• Are there any other proposals that should be considered at this stage?

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS

Visio-legally-permissable-flowchart.pdf (Hadia’s visio file)

Audio Recording

Zoom Recording

Chat Transcript

GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar (only zoom transcript will be available for this call - Zoom recording (including audio, visual, rough transcript)

Attendance 

Apologies:  Alternates:  none