Page History

...

1. Roll Call / SOI
2. Complete work on possible requirements list (Task 8) – see latest version of signup sheet (below)
   1. Progress Update
   2. Set target for completing the requirements list for task 9
   3. Outreach message #2 (draft to be circulated in separate email - see below)
   4. Identify lead points of contacts for SO/AC/SG/Cs
3. Discuss preparation for Helsinki meeting
   1. Cross-Community meeting
   2. F2F WG meeting
4. Confirm next meeting – Tuesday 14 June at 16.00 UTC

Mp3

Transcript

AC Chat 

Attendance    

Apologies:  Alan Greenberg, Alex Deacon, Ayden Férdeline, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez, Susan Prosser, Holly Raiche, Kathy Kleiman (joining late), Amr Elsadr, Lawrence Olawale-Roberts

...

2.       Complete work on possible requirements list (Task 8) – see – see latest version of signup sheet attached(below)

a.       Progress Update

• 28 documents have been covered so far
• 23 assignments still pending, including 10 that subteams flagged as especially relevant
• phrase responses as requirements, which may require paraphrasing of the document

...

c.       Outreach message #2 #2  (draft to be circulated in separate email - see below)

• Second outreach message in parallel to first request still outstanding - but approach for this one is different
• WG encouraged to work with their respective groups to facilitate responses
• Ideally input is received by Helsinki so that input can be received and discussed during meeting.
• Please review instructions - no judgement is expected to be passed on possible requirements.
• No comments on the draft outreach message received during the call.

...

• See proposed session description distributed .(below)
• WG members will draw from their own experience to share examples and invite attendees to join in a lively conversation about possible requirements.
• Further planning is expected to happen during the meeting next week.
• Encourage newcomer participation and try to avoid domination by WG members. Liaisons may be able to assist in this regard as well by encouraging their respective groups to attend and prepare accordingly.
• Focus may be on first five questions - doesn't need to be restricted to those but may faciliate preparation and focus.
• Consider whether any 'provocative' questions could be identified in advance to faciliate the discussion?
• Note that questions highlighted in description are as in the charter - not indicative of how WG will address them (see work plan for approach)

...