Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

ICANN75 CANN75 Meeting - LINK

Meeting Date/Time: Tuesday, 20 September 2022 @ 1630 UTC [time converter]



Agenda

Where Do We Stand with MSM Project?

Consensus-based Decision Making

Next Steps

Where Do We Go From Here?



Zoom Audio Replay:  HERE (m3u download)

Zoom Video Replay:  HERE (Whole Mtg: 45:37 - MSM portion: 30:00)

Chat Transcript:  EN

Meeting Transcript: EN

Slide Deck: PDF

ccNSO Jamboard: https://jamboard.google.com/d/1qQJvYqeokjqIg45JIS-xi3B7TZ7jTnMIye0SdkPJopY/edit?usp=sharing 


For questions or comments on the Jamboard or Zoom polls please contact:  giovanni.seppia@icann.org or negar.farzinnia@icann.org 

Comments: 

Attendees: 

ccNSO Members:  

ICANN Org: 

Standard Rules of Behavior - https:/www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en

ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy and Terms of Participation and Complaint Procedure - https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/community-anti-harassment-policy-2017-03-24-en


Jamboard Topics

Streamlining of reviews 
(to improve the ByLaws mandated review processes)

Operational planning process 
(to improve the quantification of resources, prioritization, flexibility, and transparency of the management of ICANN’s resources)

PDP 3.0 
(to enhance the efficiency and
effectiveness of GNSO policy development processes)

Operating Standards for Specific Reviews (A set of ICANN Bylaws-mandated, and Board-adopted, standards that ensures Reviews are conducted in a transparent, consistent, efficient, and predictable manner)

Strategic Trends process 
(critical first step in ICANN’s strategic planning process)

Language Services 
(Make information about ICANN and its work accessible to those who speak languages other than English in ways that enhance participation in and the effectiveness of the multistakeholder model)

Community Onboarding Program (mentorship-based program to improve engagement and retention of new participants within ICANN)

Holistic Review 
(a new Specific Review  to  review "the continuous improvement efforts of SO/AC/NC, etc.

Attendees:

Javier Perez, Duy Vo Tuong, Abdal Ahmed  Abdeldjalil Bachar Bong, Adeola, Akash Agarwal, Alejandra Reynoso, Ali Hadji, Ali Hussain, Alias Hidup, Amin Hacha, Amina Ramallan, Andrey Kolesnikov, Angela Matlapeng, Anthony Hubbard, Basuki Suhardiman, Benoît Ampeau, BN_Rynnol, Brett Carr, Busisiwe Mathonsi, Busola Akano, Calvin MacKenzie, Cengiz Acarturk, Chia-Ling Ho, Cody Ryan Tippie, Daiva, Danny Chan, David Charles Lawrence, Dennis Tan, Dirk Jumpertz, Dmitry Burkov, Duane Wessels, Eberhard Lisse, Eduardo Duarte, Eunice Pérez Coello, Eyitayo Iyortim, Fernando España, Fidya Shabrina, Fikri Amir Jaafar, Fiona Asonga, Folli Herbert Amouzougan, Frank Anati, Fred Baker, Gabriel Karsan, Gaurav Kansal, Geoff Huston, Giannina Raffo, Gordon Dick, GZ Kabir, Hafiz Farooq, Igor Mkrtumyan, Irina Danelia, Danko Jevtović, Isnawan, Jaap Kkerhuis, Jacques Latour, Jan Jansen, Jan Včelák, Jaromír Talíř, Jaya Kumar, Jim DeLaHunt, Jodi Anderson, Joel Karubiu, John Augenstein, John Demco, Jordi Iparraguirre, Jothan Frakes, Juan Antonio Gutierrez Gil, Juhani Juselius, Kai Terakado, Karl Reuss, Kazunori Fujiwara, Ken Renard, Khaled Saifullah, Khalid Alhammadi, Lisa Liang, Kristof Tuyteleers, Laina & Barry Greene, Lavish Mawuena Mensah, Leonid Todorov, Lu ai-chin, Lucie Nadeau, Maria Kolesnikova, Maria Monica Soliño Platero, Mark Seiden, Mats Dufberg , Merike Kaeo, Michael Bauland, Michael Palage, Mike Locke, Mohammed Awal Alhassan, Mohd Hafez, Moustapha Abakar Abdramane, Myasoedov, Nai-Wen Hsu, Nev, Nicklas Pousette, Nitin Jolly, Nitin Walia, Nivaldo Cleto, Nonofo Ramotsababa, Norman Angel, Norman Warput, Nthabiseng Pule, Oscar Giudice, Pandi-Dwi ayu, Patricio Poblete, Paul Lim, pensri, Peter Lowe, Peter Thomassen, Peter Van Roste, Pim Pastoors, Praveen Kr Singh, Puteri Ameena, Qasim zainy, Qing Cai China, Rajiv Kumar, Régis Masse, Rick Wilhelm, Rishab Dhaniya, Riyadh Zehrah, Rod Rasmussen, Roger Murray, Rubens Kuhl, Ryan Stephenson, Samwel Kariuki, Sander Steffann, Sean Baseri, Segun Akano, Sergio Ramíre , Shamsudeen Hammed, Shehu Mohammed, Shinta Sato, Shubham Saran, Simon Balthaza, Sohib Algotime, Sufian Ahmed, Suhayb, Suzanne Woolf, Svitlana Tkachenko, Anawin Pongsaboripat, Tomboye Ibrahim, Tshoganetso Kepaletswe, Chia-Ling Ho, Udeep Baral, Vadim Mikhaylov, Vicky Yu, Warren Kumar, Werner Staub, Wes Hardaker, Xia, Yin May Oo, Yoshiro Yoneya 


ICANN Org: 
Bart Boswinkel, Champika Wijayatunga, Claudia Ruiz, Daniel Fink, Danielle Rutherford, Eduardo Alvarez, Fabien Betremieux, George Sarkisyan, Gustavo Lozano Ibarra, Harel Efraim, Jian Chuan Zhang, Kathy Schnitt, Kimberly Carlson, Nicolas Antoniello, Pierre Dandjinou, Sara Caplis, Seda Akbulut, Yazid Akanho, DerekH (tech)



Standard Rules of Behavior - https:/www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en



ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy and Terms of Participation and Complaint Procedure - https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/community-anti-harassment-policy-2017-03-24-en


Zoom Poll Questions

(results to follow)

& Results:  

Poll # 1 -

 Do you know the basic principles for making decisions on a consensus basis? 

Did you achieve better consensus of goals/objectives as a result of using/learning from "Consensus Playbook?"

Image Added No.  Image Added Yes.



Poll # 2 - Did the consensus-based decision making contribute to the project (PDPs, Reviews, CCWG, etc.) success?

Image AddedNo.  Image Added

ChartstackedtruetypebaryLabelNo.

Yes.



Poll #

2

3 -

 

Are you aware of the existence of

“Consensus Playbook”?

"Consensus Playbook?"

Image AddedNo.  Image AddedYes.



Poll #

3 - 

4 - Was there good communication and context when converging differing positions?

Image AddedNo.   Image AddedYes.



Poll # 5 - Have you used/referenced the

“Consensus Playbook”

"Consensus Playbook" in ICANN work (PDPs, Reviews, CCWGs, etc.)?

Image AddedNo.  Image AddedYes.



 Poll # 6 -  Did differing positions successfully converge?

Image AddedNo.  Image AddedYes.



Poll # 7 - Do you know the basic principles for making decisions on a consensus basis?

Image AddedNo.Image Added Yes.



Poll # 8 - Did you reach better mutual understanding as a result of using

Poll # 4 - Did the consensus-based decision making contribute to the project (PDPs, Reviews, CCWGs, etc.) success?

Poll # 5 - Did you achieve better consensus of goals/objectives as a result of using/learning from “Consensus Playbook”?

Poll # 6 - Did goals/objectives become clearer as a result of

consensus-based decision making?

Image Added No.  Image Added Yes.



Poll #

7

9 -

 Did you reach better mutual understanding

Did goals/objectives become clearer as a result of

using

consensus-based decision making?

Poll # 8 - Did differing positions successfully converge?

Poll # 9 - Was there good communication and context when converging differing positions?

Image AddedNo.  Image Added Yes.