Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
 No.RecommendationRecipientThematic Group SourceAssigneesStatus
13ICANN should  review  the  overall  balance  of  stakeholder  representation  to  ensure  that appropriate consideration is given to all views, proportionally to their scope and relevance.ICANN BoardTG2
  • IANA Transition & ICANN Accountability

Status
colourYellow
titleIn Progress
 

Panel
title

...

Summary

Implementation Details

Periodic Organizational Reviews are performed by independent examiners for each of ICANN’s Supporting Organizations (SOs), Advisory Committees (ACs) (excluding the Governmental Advisory Committee - GAC), the Nominating Committee, Board of Directors, and the Technical Liaison Group (TLG). These reviews are meant to determine whether the organization has a continuing purpose in the ICANN structure, and if so, whether any change in structure or operations is desirable to improve its effectiveness.

However, there does not seem to be a periodic review of the overall composition and balance of ICANN’s stakeholder groups.

While the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability Work Stream 2 (CCWG-Accountability WS2)has a SubGroup that addresses the SO/AC Accountability issues, evaluating the composition of ICANN’s constituent parts is not within the scope of its work.  

Next Step

The ALAC will advise the ICANN Board to initiate a process -- whether through an existing review process in ICANN (e.g. The Third Accountability and Transparency Review - ATRT3) or through a new periodic review process --  to evaluate the overall composition and balance of ICANN stakeholder representation, ensuring that appropriate consideration is given to all views, proportionally to their scope and relevance.

...

Actions: 

  • : Ariel Liang to send this recommendation to the ALAC list for review.

...

 

Notes: 

  • Could feed in the accountability process

    • Part of the CCWG Accountability work (Stress Test regarding the GAC advice) may be relevant to this recommendation 
    • This recommendation is related to ATLAS II Recommendation 7, as they address different aspects of the same question. Comments on ATLAS II Recommendation 7 apply here as well. 
    • The ALAC needs to discuss this Rec 7 and Rec 13 to clearly understand what the ALAC wants out of these recommendations. 
    • ATLAS II Recommendation 7 is directly related to this recommendation

    • The definition of ‘balance’ needs to be clarified, WS2 may explore this topic