Page History
...
(Update Feb 26 2013 : Circle ID article about community objections by Don Moody : http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130219_thinking_carefully_about_new_gtld_objections_community_3_of_4/ )
(Update 6 March 2013 : Independent Objector comments on controversial applications : http://www.independent-objector-newgtlds.org/english-version/the-independent-objector-s-comments-on-controversial-applications/)
Extract from Applicant Guidebook re: Community Objections
Section 3.5.4 mentions four tests that will enable a DRSP panel to determine whether there is substantial opposition from a significant portion of the community to which the string may be targeted.
For an objection to be successful, the objector must prove that:
- The community invoked by the objector is a clearly delineated community; and
- Community opposition to the application is substantial; and
- There is a strong association between the community invoked and the applied-for gTLD string; and
- The application creates a likelihood of material detriment to the rights or legitimate interests of a significant portion of the community to which the string may be explicitly or implicitly targeted.
Section 3.5.4 of the AGB
http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/objection-procedures-04jun12-en.pdf
...
If opposition by a community is determined, but there is no likelihood of material detriment to the targeted community resulting from the applicant’s operation of the applied-for gTLD, the objection will fail.
The objector must meet all four tests in the standard for the objection to prevail.