Page History

Mp3

AC Recording

GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar

Notes/ Action Items

Actions:

By Tuesday, 26 February at 17:00 UTC (see instructions in previous email), the Sub Team is tasked to: 

1. Review the last two sources in the ‘Source’ tab of the analysis tool; provide input in the Google Docs set up for ALL Trademark Claims Charter Questions. 
2. Provide further input on the source documents assigned for the previous weeks, if any, in the Google Docs set up for all Trademark Claims Charter Questions.
3. Review the additional data submitted and provide your comment on the separate google doc [docs.google.com]. 

Instructions: 

• Previously Collected Data: When providing input, please note the source name and page/slide number of the previously collected data.
• Additional Data: Please provide your input in the third document of the separate Google Doc and note your name before your comment.
• By the deadline, the Google Docs will be locked to prevent further editing and their PDFs will be circulated to the Sub Team. Staff will accept and indicate the new input in the Google Doc for the ease of viewing. 

Source Documents:

Newly Assigned

1. ICANN Org-maintained list of Registry Operators and relevant dates for Sunrise, Trademark Claims and other specific approved program periods (e.g. Limited Registration Periods, Qualified Launch Programs): https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/sunrise-claims-periods [newgtlds.icann.org]

2. Data Sub Team Meeting with Jon Nevett (DONUTS) at ICANN61:https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79438928/Transcription%20ICANN61%20GNSO%20RPM%20Data%20Sub%20Team%20Meeting%2010%20March%202018.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1521579214000&api=v2

Previously Assigned 

1. Registry Operator Responses to Initial Survey from TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Registry%20Responses%20to%20TMCH%20Data%20Sub%20Team%20-%2013%20Dec.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1485897782000&api=v2

2. Deloitte responses to initial questions from TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team:  https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Deloitte%20responses%20to%20TMCH%20Data%20Gathering%20Sub%20Team%20questions%20-%20Jan%202017.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1485897782000&api=v2

3. Deloitte TMCH Report: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170311/e28abe0e/ICANNTMCHreport_Feb2017-0001.pdf

4. Response to follow up questions - Apr 2017:  https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170414/4591dc7c/DeloitteResponsestoFollowUpQuestions-0001.pdf

5. Analysis Group Independent Review of TMCH Services: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Analysis%20Group%20Revised%20TMCH%20Report%20-%20March%202017.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1490349029000&api=v2

6. AG Response to follow up questions - June 2017: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2017-June/002043.html

7. AG Response to follow up questions - July 2017: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170727/06a0c33e/ResponsesfromAGtoFollowUpQuestions-27July2017-0001.pdf

8. INTA Survey Final Report by Nielsen (including the original survey questions in the appendix):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61606864/INTA%20Cost%20Impact%20Report%20revised%204-13-17%20v2.1.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1500376749000&api=v2

9. Lori Schulman’s Presentation to the CCT RT (May 2017):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61606864/ICANN%20New%20gTLD%20Survey%20Update%2010May%20Final.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1501098808000&api=v2

10. Lori Schulman’s Presentation to the RPM WG (August 2017):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69277722/INTA%20New%20gTLD%20Cost%20Impact%20Study%20Presentation%20-%2030%20Aug.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1504147055000&api=v2

Google Docs:

• Claims Charter Question 1: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xIdqJc89FkVStHuceMBeShWVWD0JRD185FY5ZUjySLo/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]  
• Claims Charter Question 2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P2mckW_nLHiyffxLhT6h2NCWfpjwAcXQ4zjG1-c2sac/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Claims Charter Question 3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10R4qNC_2zEoLs-0C8_yylxavy6UApOXO7temzue6MJg/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Claims Charter Question 4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qS4ZzkfVQXxtyjj0vPuq_B85UsV8ivwr5YKKbWhex5E/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Claims Charter Question 5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wrnU1X98UE89muaDDvrYfgdPhuBXHuH6VBIO07ebtMM/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Additional Data: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1af4ONTqAF59tMBl_lY-QMr4XBQvyLI7EXmVHpazLrIA/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

Notes:

1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates provided.

2. Review the INTA New gTLD Impact Study Survey Result with respect to the Claims Charter Questions:

a. Claims Charter Question 1:

-- Whose marks are we trying to protect?  If we are talking about really big companies having more brands to protect, that might explain the response -- as to whether the data is biased.

-- Not sure that there is evidence that the claims of large TM owners and small TM owners are the same.

b. Claims Charter Questions 2, 3, 4 & 5 -- New comments will be added by George Kirikos and others who may have them.