Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Action items

Tasks for the At-Large Review Working Party: 

  •  To provide input on the selection criteria of independent examiners (e.g. examiners should have knowledge and understanding how the At-Large community operates)
  •  To review what has been done in the previous ALAC Review and add comments: https://community.icann.org/x/_580Aw. Aim to complete this AI by April 2016 
  •  To review the GNSO review and lessons learned 
  •  to To assist the Strategic Initiative Dept in the development of FAQ for the At-Large Review. It will be posted on the wiki. The FAQ should be similar to the GNSO Review FAQ: https://community.icann.org/x/zbXhAg. Aim to produce the FAQ by March 2016
  •  To identify the key individuals for the independent examiners to interview. Aim to complete this AI by April 2016 before Independent Examiners start their work, but it is not a must as new people can be added later on
  •  To discuss the aforementioned tasks in ICANN 53 Dublin

Task for Gisella: 

  •  Post-Dublin, Gisella Gruber to send doodle polls to set up two 90 min calls for the At-Large Review Working Party (make sure Alan and Olivier are available) to review the 1st ALAC Review and the GNSO Review 

...

  •  Holly Raiche and Larisa Gurnick to reach out to Jen Wolfe, GNSO Review Working Party Chair, in Dublin to talk about lessons learned in GNSO Review

...

Notes 

Clarification of timelines:

...