Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Welcome
  2. Roll Call
  3. Statements of Interest
  4. Responses From SO/ACs (IPC and any others received at: 13 Community Input )
  5. Review Work Plan and Consider Next Steps
  6. AOB

...

Actions:

1.  Responses from SOs/ACs: Review the attached chart of community input (attached and on the wiki) and provide comments via email in the format provided below.  Staff will revise the chart in advance of the next meeting.

Format for comments:

WG Response:

Recommended Action:

Answer (Y/N/NA):

Continue to review questions from EWG on IRD (at 4 Proposed Questions and Taxonomies) and other relevant documents.

2.  The Chairs should encourage the WG members who are from the Registrar SG to participate in the WG meetings.

3.  Develop slides for London: 1) update for GNSO Council; 2) slides for public meeting

 

...

For Review:

  1. Public comment review tool T&T - 22 29 May2014.doc
  2. Summary of Current Status/Next Steps (Stock Taking) 17 April 2014
  3. A Model for Exploring WHOIS Accuracy (by Margie Milam)
  4. Interim Report from the Expert Working Group on Internationalized Registration Data 10 April 2014
  5. Status update report from the EWG on gTLD Directory Services 11 November 2013
  6. WHOIS Accuracy Program Specification part of the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement

...