Page History
...
For other places see: https://tinyurl.com/2p9fx9c4
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Crystal Ondo (RrSG), Keiron Tobin (RrSG), Prudence Malinki (RrSG), Theo Guerts (RrSG) Alternates: Jothan Frakes (RrSG), Jody Kolker (RrSG), Essie Musailov (RrSG), Rich Brown (RrSG)Alternates: |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Chat Transcript (see Zoom recording, chat recording→chat tab) GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK: Ongoing Action Items: Jothan Frakes, Jim Galvin, Jody Kolker, and Rick Wilhelm have volunteered to compile a list of attack vectors and how the recommendations solve for them, or where they are out of scope. Action Items from 01 December:
Notes:
ACTION ITEM: Small Team on TTL Enforcement/Recommendation 13: Send the proposal to the list with rationale. ACTION ITEM: Staff to provide an updated flow chart of the entire transfer process to reflect the recent agreement from the WG, when all aspects of the process has been agreed to by the WG. 3. Review of Feedback on Recommendation 2 Strawman Document [docs.google.com] (feedback document [docs.google.com])
4. Review of Feedback on Revisions to Recommendations 3-9 (see pages 18-24 attached) (feedback document [docs.google.com])
ACTION ITEM: Recommendations 2-9: Staff to release revised redline based on WG agreement. 5. Revised Reasons that a Registrar of Record MAY Deny a Transfer – Recommendation 19 (Public Comment Review Tool and Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com]) c) Proposed edits: I.A.3.7.1 Potential next step: Consider whether “violation of registrar’s anti-abuse policies, or evidence of fraud” in the MAY category is an appropriate compromise. In brief, the alternatives presented in the comments: In the MAY category:
In the MUST category:
Additional proposal: Move “Evidence of fraud” to the MUST category and include “violation of the Registrar’s domain use or anti-abuse policies” in the MAY category. WG discussion and agreement:
Discussion:
|