Page History
...
For other places see: https://tinyurl.com/4j68zdtk
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Richard Wilhelm (RySG), Sarah Wyld (RrSG) Alternates: Beth Bacon (RySG), Rich Brown (RrSG) |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Chat Transcript (see Zoom recording, chat tab) GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Note | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notes/ Action Items
ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK:
Recommendation 10:
Recommendation 11:
Recommendation 13:
Notes:
Transfer Policy Review - Meeting #67 Proposed Agenda 17 November 2022
2. Welcome and Chair Updates
3. Verification of TAC Validity – Recommendation 10 (Public Comment Review Tooland Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com]) a) Concern:
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 10, a) Concern -- Staff to see where the discussion on the Losing FOA falls and then to tidy up the language in recommendations and rationales. b) Proposed edit
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 10, b) Proposed edit -- Staff to amend the recommendation according to the strawman revision suggested in the potential next step. 4. TAC is One-Time Use – Recommendation 11 (Public Comment Review Tooland Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com]) a) Concern
Discussion:
b) Proposed edit
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 11, b) Proposed edit -- Staff to revise the recommendation either according to the potential next step in the strawman revision of “unset the TAC” or retaining the term “clear” with a definition in a footnote. c) Proposed edit
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 11, c) Proposed Edit -- Jim Galvin to bring this issue back to the Registry SG for discussion/consideration.
5. Service Level Agreement (SLA) for TAC Provision – Recommendation 12 (Public Comment Review Tooland Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com]) a) Concern
Discussion:
b) Concern
Discussion:
6. TAC Time to Live (TTL) – Recommendation 13 (Public Comment Review Tooland Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com]) and question for community input (Public Comment Review Tool and Public Comment Working Document [docs.google.com]) a) Concern
Discussion:
b) Concern
Discussion:
c) Concern
Discussion:
d) Proposed edit
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 13, d) Proposed edit -- Staff to update the language to “Registry” from “Registries”. e) Proposed edit:
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 13, e) Proposed edit -- Staff to revise the language according to the Strawman revision suggested in the Potential next step. f) Proposed edit:
Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 13, f) Proposed edit -- Staff to revise the language according to the Strawman revision suggested in the Potential next step, except to change to “reset the TAC to null.” Question for Public Comment Question to the community: Who is best positioned to manage the standard 14-day TTL – the Registry or the Registrar, and why? Are there specific implications if the TTL is managed by the Losing Registrar? Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Recommendation 13, Question to the community -- Staff to call for volunteers to consider whether to 1) maintain the recommendation as is – that the registries enforces; 2) add language to the current recommendation; 3) change it to the Registrars to manage the TTL; or 4) not to specify who enforces it. Volunteers during the meeting are: Jim Galvin, Rick Wilhelm (need to confirm), Jody Kolker, and John Woodworth.
|