Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0
  • Category: (replace this text with one of the following categories: Administration/Budget, ccTLD, gTLD, IP, ICANN Structure, International Agreement)Topic: (replace this text with a keywords from title) ICANN Structures
  • Topic: GNSO Improvements, Individual Users
  • Board meeting date: 3 February 2009
  • Resolution number: 2009-02-03-05.02, 2009-02-03-05.03
  • URL for Board minutes/resolution: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-03feb09.htm
  • Status: (replace this text with: Completed, Ongoing, Suspended) Not Completed

Summary

 (replace this text with the a one-sentence summary of the resolution)

 Text

Denise Michel explained that the Board passed a resolution asking Board extended the deadline for its request for a consensus recommendation by 13 February 2009 on the treatment of individual users that can be supportive of and not duplicative of ALAC. The ALAC, through a letter form the chair and the At-Large in North America, is seeking extension of time to continue working on consensus recommendations. Denise noted that last week the GNSO council passed a resolution to that effect and is working with ALAC community to resolve issues. Staff asks that the Board support the GNSO council's request for an extension to 20 February 2009 to present its recommendations. While the 13th is the deadline for translations for Mexico, Denise recommended that the Board agree to the extension.

The Chair thanked Denise and asked if there was any discussion.

Steve Goldstein moved to extend time to 20 February 2009 and Roberto Gaetano RG seconded the motion.

The Chair stated that staff should add to the resolution that the Board thanks the GNSO council for its on-going efforts.

All present voted in favor of the resolution to provide the extension to 20 February, with addition suggested by the chair.

the GNSO structure.

 Text

Whereas, the Board has received varying recommendations on registrant and user involvement in the GNSO, and the issue of how to incorporate the legitimate interests of individual Internet users in constructive yet non-duplicative ways remains an open issue that affects GNSO restructuring.

...

Whereas members of the community are working on this request, and the GNSO Council, ALAC and NARALO have requested an extension of the deadline to 20 February 2009 for submitting a recommendation to the Board.                                 

It is hereby resolved (2009-02-03-05.02) that the Board requests that a consensus recommendation (or recommendations, if no consensus is reached) be submitted to the Board by 20 February 2009 for consideration.

It further resolved (2009-02-03-05.03) that the Board would like to thank the GNSO Council, ALAC and NARALO for their continuing efforts to reach a consensus recommendation.


Implementation Actions

  • Notify relevant communities (replace this text with specific Action Item)
    • Responsible entity: (replace this text with the responsible entity: ICANN department, ICANN Community Structure, Board, U.S. Department of Commerce)ICANN Policy Staff
    • Due date: (replace this text with Due Date)None specified
    • Completion date: (replace this text with Date action was implemented, if different from due date)
  • (replace this text with specific Action Item)
    • Responsible entity: (replace this text with the responsible entity: ICANN department, ICANN Community Structure, Board, U.S. Department of Commerce)
    • Due date: (replace this text with Due Date)
    • Completion date: (replace this text with Date action was implemented, if different from due date)

Other Related Resolutions

  • (replace this text with links to related resolutions)

Additional Information

...

    • 4 February 2009
  • Consensus recommendation submitted to Board
    • Responsible entity: GNSO and ALAC
    • Due date: 20 February 2009
    • Completion date: Not completed

Other Related Resolutions

  • TBD

Additional Information

  • No additional funding provided.

Explanatory text does not modify or override Resolutions.  See Board Resolutions Page for more information.

Note: The "Add Comment" box below is for sharing information about implementation of this resolution. Off-topic comments will be removed.