AT-LARGE GATEWAY

At-Large Website

ALAC

RALOs

At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)

At-Large Governance

At-Large Reports

Policy Comments & Advice

Working Groups

ICANN Meetings

At-Large Summit (ATLAS III)

At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development

ALAC and RALO Elections, Selections, and Appointments

At-Large FY25 Strategic Priority Activities

Versions Compared

Old Version 9

changes.mady.by.user Yrjo Lansipuro

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Yrjo Lansipuro

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

This page is for you to publish your meeting reports for Tuesday. Please log in with your email address and password and use the "edit" button to add your report.

Reports from other days:

Saturday, 04 December 2010 Meetings
Sunday, 05 December 2010 Meetings
Monday, 06 December 2010 Meetings
Wednesday, 08 December 2010 Meetings
Thursday, 09 December 2010 Meetings
Friday, 10 December 2010 Meetings

Security, Stability & Resiliency of the DNS Review Team Meeting

Time: 0900 - 1700
Location: Room 161
Author: Didier

Please add your report here

ccNSO Members Meeting

Time: 0900 - 1830
Location: Barahona 2
Author: Ron

Please add your report here

GAC Meeting with the ccNSO

Time: 1400 - 1530
Location: Barahona 3
Author: Ron, Sylvia, Yrjö, Sergio

Reported by Yrjö Länsipuro

The GAC/ccNSO meeting discussed three main topics: efforts of the Delegation and Redelegation Working Group of the ccNSO to determine the need for PDP’s  for retirement, delegation and redelegation of ccTLDs; geographic names in new gTLD’s; and (briefly) IDN ccTLD PDP.

1)The WG recommends PDP for retirement, where no policy now exists. There have been three cases so far. .su and .tp still exist.   To correct the present inconsistences in delegation, a PDP would take too long. The WG recommends a 2-step process: first a framework of interpretation, then eventually a PDP. For contested redelegations, PDP is recommended.

More information on DRDWG web page: http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/drdwg.htm

2) On geographic names, GAC representatives pointed out that governments should not need to wait until they can file an objection. Some sort of prior quick look process is needed.

3) It was noted that  in addition to scripts other than Latin, the IDN PDP also applies to Latin scripts with non-ASCII characters.

Intellectual Property Constituency

Time: 1400 - 1600
Location: Barahona 4
Author: Hong Xue, Vivek

Reported by Hong Xue, APRALO

The meeting began with a briefing by ICANN staff on Contract Compliance. It was largely consistent with the information delivered by the same people to ALAC meeting. So it is not  necessary to repeat the contents of the briefings. There were questions asked about WPDFA about dates and time frame. 15 days were required for Registrar to respond. 45 days were proposed and for reconsideration.  

GAC Meeting with the ICANN Board

Time: 1645 - 1815
Location: Barahona 3
Author: Yrjö

Reported by Yrjö Länsipuro

Most of the time of the meeting was taken up by a discussion on new gTLD’s.   From the GAC side, the basic message was ”we’re still not there”.   Most of the specific points made by GAC members are reflected in the GAC communique, so they are not repeated here.

There was little time to discuss the other topic, ie. ATRT. On that issue, a couple of GAC members reminded the Board of the recommendations of the President’s Strategy Committee concerning the internationalization of ICANN.

Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency Organizational Meeting

Time: 1730 - 1900
Location: Comision 2AB
Author: Wolf

Please add your report here