ページ履歴
...
Question 9 | Name and RALO | Questions | Responses |
Alberto Soto | You think that the criteria for this selection, are correct and sufficient? Requires modifications? | ||
| Rinalia Abdul Rahim | I believe that the criteria for the selection of Board Candidates are sufficiently rigorous because it combines the general requirements of an ICANN Board Director with the special requirements of an At-Large Board Director. However, having a correct and sufficient set of criteria is not enough. There is also a need for an effective vetting mechanism to ensure that candidates presented to the electorate actually fulfill the criteria. This responsibility goes to the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee, which has a balanced composition of able members from all regions and led by Roberto Gaetano, who is a respected member of the At-Large community. | ||
| Sebastien Bachollet | |||
| Alan Greenberg | Yes, I am satisfied that the criteria are sufficient. They include those mandated by the ICANN Bylaws, those required by the Nominating Committee and additional criteria including the need to be free of contracted party (registrar and registry) conflict. | ||
| Evan Leibovitch | I am personally satisfied that the criteria are relevant; indeed each of the candidates advanced by the current process greatly exceeds the listed qualifications. | ||
| J.J. Subrenat | You put this question yesterday 6 March, during the conference call which provided an opportunity for the candidates to present themselves, and to respond to questions from the At-Large community. I'm glad to repeat in writing what I expressed yesterday: yes, I think the criteria are sufficient. In fact, having too many parameters or criteria would carry the risk of losing the wider picture: what are a candidate's stature, credibility, ability to listen, ability to convince, familiarity with Internet matters, and experience in working on a high-level Board? |
