Page History
Item remains on the Council agenda | Item is to be completed but off the Council agenda | Item completed |
---|
...
Topic | Entry Date (E) ____________ Target Date (T) | Action Item | Responsible Council Member ____ Responsible Staff member |
| |||||||||||||
Fellowship Mentoring Program |
| ||||||||||||||||
Temporary Specification for Registration Data Expedited Policy Development Process - Recurring Update
| 27 Sep
|
| |||||||||||||||
IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms | ICANN63 GNSO Council event
| COMPLETED | 27 Sep
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Termination RDS PDP | Strategic Planning Session Action Items
| COMPLETED | 27 Sep
|
| |||||||||||||
PDP 3.0 | Council leadership to take stock of action items and determine what is completed, unrealistic to achieve, etc.
| COMPLETED | 16 Aug
|
|
| collaborate with NCSG members to help them better understand legal basis and rationale for protections.
| send recording of final WG call to NCSG Council members.
| ||||||||||
Standing Committee Budget Operations
|
|
| Nathalie Peregrine | ||||||||||||||
Final Recommendations Reconvened PDP | EPDP Update | ||||||||||||||||
Status | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
colour | Blue | ||||||||||||||||
title | COMPLETED |
|
| Rafik Dammak | GNSO2 Review
| 16 Aug |
| Julie Hedlund |
| Mary Wong | |||||||
GNSO Liaison to the GAC
|
|
| Nathalie Peregrine | ||||||||||||||
Effects to GDD projects from GDPR
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Fellowship Program | IFR team |
|
| Geo Regions Review | |||||||||||||
Status | |||||||||||||||||
colour | Blue | ||||||||||||||||
title | COMPLETED |
|
| Consideration of CCWG-Accountability WS2 Final Report |
| COMPLETED | 19 Jul
|
|
| ||||||||
GNSO2 Review |
|
| Julie Hedlund | ||||||||||||||
Next steps following adoption of ICANN Board Temporary Specification | IFR team |
| COMPLETED | 19 Jul
|
|
| Leadership to communicate that Council has reached agreement in principle that the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) is the proper mechanism to address the Temporary Specification to the ICANN Board.Council tobegin some initial EPDP processes (e.g., initiation, charter drafting).|||||||||||
Status | |||||||||||||||||
colour | Blue | ||||||||||||||||
title | COMPLETED |
| |||||||||||||||
Status | |||||||||||||||||
colour | Blue | ||||||||||||||||
title | COMPLETED |
| Updated Charter for the Cross Community Engagement Group on Internet Governance
|
|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- GNSO Council, after having considered the 1 August letter from Akram Atallah and receiving a brief update from GDD on its 24 August Council meeting, should determine next steps for reviewing the Whois Procedure.
- Drafting team members to share draft charter and identified questions in charter with respective SG/Cs for feedback, following which the drafting team will review this input and finalize the charter for GNSO Council consideration.
- Council to consider adoption of charter at its upcoming meeting
- Call for volunteers to be delayed at least until the EPDP hits the milestone of publishing its Initial Report. Council to discuss this topic once that milestone is hit.
- ICANN Staff to circulate a call for volunteers (subsequent to the initiation and chartering process for the EPDP on the Temporary Specification) to the GNSO Stakeholder Groups, with the request for each Stakeholder Group to appoint up to 3 members to the Implementation Advisory Group (IAG). The call for volunteers should also be more widely circulated to seek volunteers to serve as participants and observers to the IAG.
Michele Neylon Paul McGrady k drazek Stephanie Perrin Pam Little
Marika Konings Nathalie Peregrine
GNSO members for the ICANN Accountability and Transparency (ATRT3) Review Team
- GNSO Secretariat to communicate resolved #1 (“The GNSO Council nominates, ranked in order: Brian Cute (RySG), Wolfgang Kleinwächter (NCSG), Stéphane Van Gelder (RySG) as its primary three candidates for the ATRT3. Furthermore, the GNSO nominates, in ranked order: Tatiana Tropina (NCSG), Michael Karanicolas (NCSG), Adetola Sogbesan (BC), Erica Varlese (RySG) to be considered for inclusion in the ATRT3 by the SO-AC Chairs should additional places be available that need to be filled.”) to the staff supporting the ATRT3.
- GNSO Secretariat to inform the endorsed candidates that the GNSO Council expects that if selected for the ATRT3, the applicant will represent the views of the entire GNSO community in their work on the ATRT3, and provide regular feedback as a group on the discussions taking place in the ATRT3, as well as the positions being taken by GNSO Review Team members. (to be completed after meeting with other SO/ACs to determine final Review Team membership)
- Staff supporting the ATRT3 and application process to send a response to those applicants who did not receive endorsement for this Review Team, thanking them for their interest and note their importance in the event an alternate is needed in the future. The response should encourage them to follow the ATRT3 work, participate in Public Comments and community discussions, and to apply for future opportunities within the GNSO Community as they arise. (to be completed after meeting with other SO/ACs to determine final Review Team membership)
- ICANN Staff to post GNSO Council Leadership letter to GNSO nominated ATRT3 members on the GNSO Correspondence page.
- Standing Selection Committee to check with selected candidates and determine if they are still interested in serving on the ATRT3.
- ICANN staff to ask MSSI what the expected timeline to begin work is, once the short/long-term review public comment periods conclude. Inquire as well if they are intending to run an additional call for volunteers.
- Council Leadership to ask other SO/ACs if they have a need for an additional call for volunteers.
IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Susan Kawaguchi to collaborate with the PDP WG and staff to develop a draft final report for preliminary consideration by the GNSO Council (targeting May meeting).
- ICANN staff to inform the IGO-INGO CRP PDP WG that the GNSO Council resolved that the Working Group, in line with the Council’s priority to ensure responsible allocation of resources and timely management of the PDP, the Final Report be submitted in time to meet the July 2018 GNSO Council meeting document deadline.
- Councilors to review Final Report, especially in the broader context of the appropriate overall scope of protection for all IGO identifiers, in preparation for consideration as early as the August Council meeting.
- ICANN staff to inform the ICANN Board and the GAC that the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Mechanisms PDP Working Group has completed its work and forward a copy of the Final Report to them
- Councilors to review Final Report and options flowchart, then prepare a list of questions by 31 August 2018 that they have, for response by the WG leadership, WG liaison, WG members, or staff as appropriate.
- ICANN staff to work with the GNSO Chair and Council liaison to determine possible ways to address concerns regarding some of the PDP recommendations within the scope of the PDP Manual, in light of the fact that the WG has not identified any recommendations as being interdependent.
- Next steps for the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms PDP WG Final Report - ICANN staff to schedule webinar for questions and answers
Consensus Policy Implementation Framework
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Councilors to review proposed amendments to the Consensus Policy Implementation Framework (CPIF) and if desired, disseminate to their respective Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies. The goal is to ensure feedback is returned to ICANN org in a timely manner and allow for them to provide a proposed final version by the end of July.
- Councilors to review Post Implementation Consensus Policy Review Framework (PICPRF) process diagram and complete survey by 18 May (see https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/postimplreview).
- ICANN staff to provide Consensus Policy Implementation Framework (CPIF) updates and related slides to the Council list.
- Council to determine by 31 July 2018 whether the proposed updates are acceptable or determine if something further is needed (e.g., webinar)
- Staff to review feedback received and share updated CPIF with Council
Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
| ||||||||||
Updated Charter for the Cross Community Engagement Group on Internet Governance
|
|
| ||||||||
Drafting Team on charter related to the next steps for the ICANN Procedure of Handling Whois conflicts with Privacy
|
|
| ||||||||
IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms
|
|
| ||||||||
Consensus Policy Implementation Framework
|
|
|
Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Role and responsibilities of Council leadership |
| |||
Changes to GNSO Operating Procedures and related governance documents to facilitate participation in Empowered Community |
| |||
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes |
Status | ||||
colour | Blue | |||
title | COMPLETED |
| Role and responsibilities of Council leadership |
| Role of Council liaisons
Status | ||||
colour | Blue | |||
title | COMPLETED |
| Changes to GNSO Operating Procedures and related governance documents to facilitate participation in Empowered Community |
| How to manage Council’s 2018 workload: strategies to increase effectiveness
Status | ||||
colour | Blue | |||
title | COMPLETED | |||
What does Council need/want to achieve in 2018, and how to do this? |
|
-
Other Council Related Action Items
...