Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

AGENDA (English) TO BE UPDATED

...

1.     Roll call 

...

2’

2.     Open Public comment (Mohamed) 5 

Statements approved by the ALAC

      • Release for Registration one .COM Domain Name with a Single-Character Label: O.COM

        During ICANN62, the ALAC revised, ratified and resubmitted their Statement. The ALAC supported the proposition, provided it offers the proceeds to nonprofit organizations that serve the public interest. The ALAC offered three suggestions to that end: (1) ICANN should permit the release of O.com and allow Verisign to conduct a third-party auction, (2) Third-party auction service providers should screen candidates for auction, and (3) Verisign should forfeit the auction’s proceeds and renewals to non-profit entity.
      • Draft Final Report of the RSSAC2 Review
        The ALAC is responsible for representing the interests of Internet end users within ICANN, and there are few parts of the Internet as critical as the Root Server System. The ALAC commented specifically on recommendations 1, 2 and 5 of the RSSAC2 Review, related to 1) RSSAC membership criteria, the 2) RSSAC charter and 3) engaging more effectively with ICANN.

Statements in process - DraftComment or Vote

...

Draft ICANN Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Unified Access Model Requested ASAP
Penholder(s): TBC

...

Comment IPC/BC Accreditation & Access Model for Non-Public Data v1.6 Requested ASAP Note: Not a formal ICANN public comment.
Penholder(s): 
Holly RaicheJonathan ZuckAlan Greenberg

...

Draft Draft Community Travel Support Guidelines  
Penholder(s): Alan Greenberg

...

Draft Open Data Initiative Datasets and Metadata  
Penholder(s): Alan Greenberg

...

Draft Draft Proposal of the New Fellowship Program Approach 
Penholder(s): Maureen Hilyard

...

Comment Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews  
Penholder(s): Cheryl Langdon-OrrSebastien BacholletDaniel Khauka NanghakaVanda Scartezini

...

Draft Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews  
Penholder(s): Alan Greenberg

...


...

...

 

...

3 July 2018

26 Sep. 2018

Statements that seem to be stalled

      • None 

Public Comment requests to which the ALAC decided not to submit Statements

New Public Comment requests to which the ALAC needs to make decisions

Upcoming Public Comment Requests

July

      • Proposal for Devanagari Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
      • Proposal for Gurumukhi Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
      • Competition, Consumer Trust & Consumer Choice Review Team – Final Report
      • New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) – Initial Report
      • Implementation of Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program
      • Proposal for Gujarati Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)

August

      • Proposal for Telugu Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
      • Proposal for Kannada Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
      • Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) 2 Review: Draft Report and Recommendations

...

1.   

Reports

    1. i.       Recent and upcoming Activitiesof ALAC (Seun, Tijani, Hadia) 5’

...

    1. ii.     Report of Hot Topics Implementation WG Activities ( Dave, Abdulkarim, Daniel ) 5’
    2. iii.    Report of new gTLDs subsequent procedures working group 5 ( Ali Hussain ) 5’
    3. iv.    CCWG Accountability: Sub-Groups of Work stream 2 (Tijani, Seun)

...

    1. 5’
    2. v.      Recent and upcoming Activities of AFRALO members (All) 5’

 

 

  1. 2

...

  1. .    Items for Discussion
  2. i.

...

  1.       Africa Strategy version 3 review ( Fatimata, Tijani, Mohamed )5
  2. ii.     AfRALO Rules of Procedures update ( Mohamed ) 15
    1. 3.    
    1. New ALS Applications ( Mohamed, Sarah5’

...

    1. 1.

...

    1.      Status of AFRALO individualmember application (Sarah) 5’

...

    1. 4.

...

    1.      AnyOther Business(All) 5’

 



FRENCH Version TO BE UPDATED

...

Statements approved by the ALAC

      • Release for Registration one .COM Domain Name with a Single-Character Label: O.COM

        During ICANN62, the ALAC revised, ratified and resubmitted their Statement. The ALAC supported the proposition, provided it offers the proceeds to nonprofit organizations that serve the public interest. The ALAC offered three suggestions to that end: (1) ICANN should permit the release of O.com and allow Verisign to conduct a third-party auction, (2) Third-party auction service providers should screen candidates for auction, and (3) Verisign should forfeit the auction’s proceeds and renewals to non-profit entity.
      • Draft Final Report of the RSSAC2 Review
        The ALAC is responsible for representing the interests of Internet end users within ICANN, and there are few parts of the Internet as critical as the Root Server System. The ALAC commented specifically on recommendations 1, 2 and 5 of the RSSAC2 Review, related to 1) RSSAC membership criteria, the 2) RSSAC charter and 3) engaging more effectively with ICANN.

...