Sub Team members to review the complete responses from Providers, including the questions that Providers offered similar responses, and bring up issues that deserve further discussions/deliberation in the full Working Group via the mailing list
Staff to identify issues for further discussions and circulate the list with the Sub Team by Wed, 25 July
Staff to update the spreadsheet with notes captured in today's call
NOTES
Row 101: Some determinations issued by FORUM Examiners didn't state how the burden of proof is satisfied or the reasons for their determinations, and this needs to be further discussed.
Row 103: No issues
Row 105: The non-implementation of URS suspension should be further discussed; ICANN needs to make sure registry operators are following the rules/procedures and suspend the domain names.
Row 106: Registrars have a role in the extension of the suspension for one additional year, but some of them don't understand their role. Registrar education and their lack of understanding of their role is an issue.
Row 107: The WG may need to re-examine the URS technical requirements and understand whether any change needs to be made.
Row 111: No issue
Row 112: No issue
Row 113: No issue
Row 128: No issue; the small number of appeals may not be a bad thing
Row 129: No issue
Row 136: No issue
Row 137: ADNDRC may have been out of compliance with technical requirements
