Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Questions
    • Are these purposes or use cases? Many see what has been produced so far as use cases
    • Does calling them “purposes” imply legitimacy? Or can we frame these as possible purposes?
    • How do we get from use cases to purposes?
    • Formulation of one-sentence action focuses on contact – but not always limited to contact?
    • Will also need to identify impact on registrant (data subject) when stating purpose
    • See chat comments about limitations of the suggested formulation and use of formulation as a tool to teach out contact specifics and help teams pinpoint other data or needs
    • For example, putting registrant first highlights when registrant-supplied data is being used to enable contact with another party not the registrant
    • Next Meeting Dates:
      • 7 Nov – no full WG call, complete DT work
      • Schedule of DT calls: https://community.icann.org/x/lgByB
      • Next full WG Call: 14 Nov – 17:00 UTC
      • NOTE: Starting next week, we shift back to the weekly call time slots used last winter: 17:00/06:00 UTC

MEETING MATERIALS

  • SlidesICANN60 RDS PDP F2F v6.PDF (updated 1 November for Wednesday F2F)
  • List of Drafting Teams (includes team member lists & links to team email archives)
  • Drafting Team outputs - may be updated in advance of meeting:
    • DT1: Tech Issue Resolution and DNS Research [doc, PDF]
    • DT2: Domain Name Control and Individual Internet Use [docPDF]
    • DT3: Domain Name Certification [docPDF]
    • DT4: Domain Name Purchase/Sale [docPDF]
    • DT5: Regulatory or Contractual Enforcement [docPDF]
    • DT6: Legal Actions [docPDF]
    • DT7: Criminal Investigation/DNS Abuse Mitigation [docPDF] and slides