Page History

...

Recommendation 19: As strategic manager rather than a policy body the GNSO Council should continue to focus on ensuring that a Working Group has been properly constituted, has thoroughly fulfilled the terms of its charter and has followed due process. Status: Staff has revised with additional references and WG will discuss on 27 July 2017sent for a one-week review.  If there are no objections it will be sent for a two-week consensus call.

Recommendation 30: That the GNSO develop and implement a policy for the provision of administrative support for Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies; and that Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies annually review and evaluate the effectiveness of administrative support they receive.  Status: Staff has sent will revise the draft charter to the Working Group for review.  Discussion will commence on the list and at the meeting charter based on the discussion from the call on 27 July.

Phase 2: High Priority Recommendations

...

Out for Consensus Call:

TBD

WG Reviewing Charters:

MOVED FROM PHASE 1 TO 2: Recommendation 31: That the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on GAC Early Engagement in the GNSO Policy Development Process continue its two work streams as priority projects. As a part of its work it should consider how the GAC could appoint a non-binding, non-voting liaison to the Working Group of each relevant GNSO PDP as a means of providing timely input.  Status: Resume discussion in Phase 2.

MOVED FROM PHASE 1 TO 2: Recommendation 18: That the GNSO Council evaluate post implementation policy effectiveness on an ongoing basis (rather than periodically as stated in the current GNSO Operating Procedures); and that these evaluations are analyzed by the GNSO Council to monitor and improve the drafting and scope of future PDP Charters and facilitate the effectiveness of GNSO policy outcomes over time.  Status: On hold pending implementation review.

MOVED FROM PHASE 1 TO 2 AND ON HOLD: Recommendation 33: That Stakeholder Groups, Constituencies, and the Nominating Committee, in selecting their candidates for appointment to the GNSO Council, should aim to increase the geographic, gender and cultural diversity of its participants, as defined in ICANN Core Value 4.  Status: On hold pending results of the Work Stream CCWG Subteam diversity questionnaire.MOVED FROM PHASE 1 TO 2: Recommendation 31: That the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on GAC Early Engagement in the GNSO Policy Development Process continue its two work streams as priority projects. As a part of its work it should consider how the GAC could appoint a non-binding, non-voting liaison to the Working Group of each relevant GNSO PDP as a means of providing timely input.  Status: Resume discussion in Phase 2.

Staff to Draft Charters:

...