Page History
...
GNSO Review Implementation Charter Rec 13 v1 20 June 2017.pdf – Update on ICANN Information Transparency InitiativeGNSO Review Implementation Charter Rec 19 v1 13 July 2017.pdf – Begin discussion on 13 July 2017
GNSO Review Implementation Charter Rec 30 v1 13 July 2017.pdf – Begin discussion on 13 July 2017 (time permitting)
Consensus Call:
TBDCONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Review Implementation Charter Rec 13 v3 13 July 2017.pdf
Implementation Plans Completed and Approved by Consensus:
...
| Phase | Recommendations | Approved | Consensus Calls | Under Review | Staff to Draft |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | 54% | 0%9% | 18%36% | 27%0% |
| 2 | 8 | 0% | 0% | 37.5% | 67.5% |
| 3 | 15 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
...
Recommendations 24 & 25: 24 – That the GNSO Council and Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies adhere to the published process for applications for new Constituencies. That the ICANN Board in assessing an application satisfy itself that all parties have followed the published process, subject to which the default outcome is that a new Constituency is admitted. That all applications for new Constituencies, including historic applications, be published on the ICANN website with full transparency of decision-making. 25 – That the GNSO Council commission the development of, and implement, guidelines to provide assistance for groups wishing to establish a new Constituency.
Out for Consensus Call:TBD
Recommendation 13: That the GNSO Council evaluate and, if appropriate, pilot a technology solution (such as Loomio or similar) to facilitate wider participation in Working Group consensus-based decision making.
WG Reviewing Charters:
Recommendations 10/11 10 – That the GNSO Council develop criteria for Working Groups to engage a professional facilitator/moderator in certain situations. 11 – That the face-to-face PDP Working Group pilot project be assessed when completed. If the results are beneficial, guidelines should be developed and support funding made available.Recommendation 13: That the GNSO Council evaluate and, if appropriate, pilot a technology solution (such as Loomio or similar) to facilitate wider participation in Working Group consensus-based decision making Status: On hold pending evaluation of Geographic Names Facilitated Session at ICANN59.
Recommendation 19: As strategic manager rather than a policy body the GNSO Council should continue to focus on ensuring that a Working Group has been properly constituted, has thoroughly fulfilled the terms of its charter and has followed due process. Status: Staff is revising with additional references and then will send for a one-week review.
Recommendation 30: That the GNSO develop and implement a policy for the provision of administrative support for Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies; and that Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies annually review and evaluate the effectiveness of administrative support they receive. Status: Staff has sent the draft charter to the Working Group for review. Discussion will commence on the list and at the meeting on 27 July.
Phase 2: High Priority Recommendations
...
MOVED FROM PHASE 1 TO 2: Recommendation 18: That the GNSO Council evaluate post implementation policy effectiveness on an ongoing basis (rather than periodically as stated in the current GNSO Operating Procedures); and that these evaluations are analyzed by the GNSO Council to monitor and improve the drafting and scope of future PDP Charters and facilitate the effectiveness of GNSO policy outcomes over time. Status: On hold pending implementation review.
MOVED FROM PHASE 1 TO 2 AND ON HOLD: Recommendation 33: That Stakeholder Groups, Constituencies, and the Nominating Committee, in selecting their candidates for appointment to the GNSO Council, should aim to increase the geographic, gender and cultural diversity of its participants, as defined in ICANN Core Value 4. Status: On hold pending results of the Work Stream CCWG Subteam diversity questionnaire.
MOVED FROM PHASE 1 TO 2: Recommendation 31: That the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on GAC Early Engagement in the GNSO Policy Development Process continue its two work streams as priority projects. As a part of its work it should consider how the GAC could appoint a non-binding, non-voting liaison to the Working Group of each relevant GNSO PDP as a means of providing timely input. Status: Resume discussion in Phase 2.
Staff to Draft Charters:
Recommendations 26, 27, 28, 29: 26 – That GNSO Council members, Executive Committee members of Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies and members of Working Groups complete and maintain a current, comprehensive Statement of Interest on the GNSO website. Where individuals represent bodies or clients, this information is to be posted. If not posted because of client confidentiality, the participant’s interest or position must be disclosed. Failing either of these, the individual not be permitted to participate. 27 – That the GNSO establish and maintain a centralized publicly available list of members and individual participants of every Constituency and Stakeholder Group (with a link to the individual’s Statement of Interest where one is required and posted). 28 – That section 6.1.2 Membership of Chapter 6.0 Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies: Operating Principles and Participation Guidelines of the GNSO Operating Procedures be revised to clarify that key clauses are mandatory rather than advisory, and to institute meaningful sanctions for non-compliance where appropriate. 29 – That Statements of Interest of GNSO Council Members and Executive Committee members of all Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies include the total number of years that person has held leadership positions in ICANN.
Recommendation 6: That the GNSO record and regularly publish statistics on Working Group participation (including diversity statistics).
Phase 3: Medium and Low Priority Recommendations
...
