Versions Compared

Old Version 23

changes.mady.by.user Lisa Phifer

Saved on

compared with

New Version 24

changes.mady.by.user Lisa Phifer

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

1) Roll Call/SOI Updates
2) Plan to complete in-progress tasks
    a) ccTLD questions
    b) Definition of authoritative
3) Revised Task 12 sequence and timeline
    See RDSPDP-Task12-Revised-21April2017.pdf
4) Start deliberation on the charter question/subquestion 5.1:
    Should gTLD registration "thin data" be entirely public or should access be controlled?
    See NewSection5-Intro-KeyConcepts-21April2017.pdf
5) Confirm action items and proposed decision points
6) Confirm next meeting date: 2 May 2017 at 16:00 UTC

 

Apologies: Holly Raiche, Olévié Kouami, Greg Aaron, Stephanie Perrin, Susan Prosser, Mark Svancarek, Rod Rasmussen, Alan Greenberg, Victoria Sheckler, Benny Samuelsen, Michele Neylon, Viviane Gomes Vinagre
Transcript


 

Notes RDS PDP WG Meeting 

These high-level notes are designed to help PDP WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki here.

1) Roll Call/SOI Updates

  • Attendance will be taken from AC
  • Please remember to state your name before speaking and remember to mute your microphones when not speaking
  • SOI updates: none

...

5) Confirm action items and proposed decision points

Action Item #1:   Susan Kawaguchi to send list of questions to the full Working Group for review following the Working Group call, with the goal of finalizing the list for transmission to selected ccTLDs following next WG call

Action Item #2:   Working Group members should review the proposed questions to ccTLD operators, and send any feedback on-list prior to next Working Group call

Action Item #3:   David Cake will communicate to the full Working Group by the end of this week proposed definitions/concepts to replace the term "authoritative" proposed new term(s) to reflect this

Action Item #4: Working Group members should review the proposed term(s) and definition(s) and provide any feedback on-list, preferably prior to next Working Group call 

Action Item #5: All WG members to review the new section 5 found here: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56986791/KeyConceptsDeliberation-WorkingDraft-21April2017.pdf, which reflects how the EWG broke apart this complex question into a few key concepts

...